From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DCC45B9C; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:13:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DFF402EB; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:13:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.190]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2604402A3 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:13:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.234]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XXhfY19Z2z2FbBW; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:12:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500024.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.10]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC1A114010D; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:13:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.50.165.33) by dggpeml500024.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:13:42 +0800 From: Chengwen Feng To: , CC: , Subject: [PATCH v3 0/8] refactor kvargs test Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 06:14:23 +0000 Message-ID: <20241022061431.21925-1-fengchengwen@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20231103095325.47843-1-fengchengwen@huawei.com> References: <20231103095325.47843-1-fengchengwen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.50.165.33] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To dggpeml500024.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.10) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org When developing patchset [1], I found the kvargs test is hard to understand when tried to add some testcase. So refactor kvargs by: 1. introduce UT suite framework. 2. extract big test_valid_kvargs() to five part. And add myself for voluntary maintenance of the kvargs library. [1] https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20231103073811.13196-1-fengchengwen@huawei.com/ Chengwen Feng (8): app/test: introduce UT suite framework for kvargs app/test: extract basic token count testcase for kvargs app/test: extract without keys testcase for kvargs app/test: extract with keys testcase for kvargs app/test: extract parse list value testcase for kvargs app/test: extract parse empty elements testcase for kvargs app/test: add process opt testcase for kvargs maintainers: update for kvargs library --- v3: add rte_kvargs_process_opt()'s testcase. v2: remove copyright line and add Stephen's ack. MAINTAINERS | 1 + app/test/test_kvargs.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 2 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1