From: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
To: Lewis Donzis <lew@perftech.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: Including contigmem in core dumps
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:47:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241022174711.7862000d@sovereign> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <402897283.8962444.1729600888805.JavaMail.zimbra@donzis.com>
2024-10-22 07:41 (UTC-0500), Lewis Donzis:
> I've been wondering why we exclude memory allocated by
> eal_get_virtual_area() from core dumps? (More specifically, it calls
> eal_mem_set_dump() to call madvise() to disable core dumps from the
> allocated region.)
>
> On many occasions, when debugging after a crash, it would have been very
> convenient to be able to see the contents of an mbuf or other object
> allocated in contigmem space. And we often avoid using the rte memory
> allocator just because of this.
>
> Is there any reason for this, or could it perhaps be a compile-time
> configuration option not to call madvise()?
The commit that originally added madvise() argued that dumping everything
ended up in coredumps with "useless" data [non-mapped or unused pages]:
http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=d72e4042c5ebda7af81448b387af8218136402d0
Dumping mapped pages sounds reasonable in many cases.
Not in all cases admittedly:
- legacy memory mode mapping a lot of pages that are not (yet) used;
- if packet data is confidential while the app is not.
The option to dump or not can easily be a runtime one.
The safe default however seems to be "off".
In dynamic memory node (not FreeSBD, unfortunately)
rte_mem_event_callback-register() may be used to call madvise().
Maybe DPDK should allow such callbacks in any mode
and invoke them during initialization to make the above solution universal.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-22 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-22 12:41 Lewis Donzis
2024-10-22 14:47 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk [this message]
2024-10-22 15:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-22 15:57 ` Morten Brørup
2024-10-22 16:00 ` Lewis Donzis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-05-28 0:34 Lewis Donzis
2024-05-28 6:55 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2024-05-28 13:19 ` Lewis Donzis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241022174711.7862000d@sovereign \
--to=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=lew@perftech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).