From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FA245BB4; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:46:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEA340B97; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:46:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-il1-f178.google.com (mail-il1-f178.google.com [209.85.166.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8558E409FA for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:46:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-il1-f178.google.com with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-3a3bd422b52so281045ab.0 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 09:46:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1729701977; x=1730306777; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:subject:cc:to :from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GTmHOo4SZM6A0whKjzMDRofGzytB0Ca8sM+uMJCEpYc=; b=BZUokha8SftkRdRhQYWTgiZ4diynNfPguOP4pz+q37YfP19hW+juRcj7Do6voLyM/C kHKCYdhlwRHl8iAihCGuCMT7rPCBSX7mWSJQ29buYemgxtw4AWlgQaph9ZMlJdDkPUMo +38vG5qCTs+cw8/DMTLecqTCojTZGMJuL7+qmY+qzlsTmq0PIYNdhYuC4hi1uNyOBnZ+ HM8gYrFan/sD5iH5lqS6duJbcI1lDmxoenCexs3qqXDcQlEChWxfapNjcbtWs2fyBeeK g79auYUIm+ykOYmHUUwx4PfcZH4KoFHav9M2JGwHHPLIc8DfHa0I1oTsfLmCjaJEfHmr EQZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729701977; x=1730306777; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:subject:cc:to :from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=GTmHOo4SZM6A0whKjzMDRofGzytB0Ca8sM+uMJCEpYc=; b=EUCqfZAMLgAD1/pxC5UaArLzc+vD5II8UtTd4B6KdGK7q7WkY2xNu3pLWSsG2S97dw 30jg6PoztjMsPdoUaCWg9OsAwORHmbYC6TP7UmErI9nB+dKWAOJq5fj7YqbXwKXJFD2I KyaNZN/p5IFoiQqtqjoNv8od39O+vXf3yJ9QxWzTQ5SsSzhnw+sb0g0gi0tMWrSpqOkb MOrd4Q8PhTnFTrI7mpwP4HtcTaV4BclXUw++yxrXPUf4igvQHvWBp4Fy3mXdiPOKZrO2 KyZSpRxxNhu3nRi6Z/YL+yYeWeMcCIyVaOsfkhdXYc3WhRp8OAwxW7U+dbChgxUN8Lpz 4wdg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzp3q9c+s1wH/aQ/iR6oYz2A1oDkMG8TuKTE8UoaAL77SSS8XjR Z3sICN3ukKUyn9XRBqjUs3ZWut+NEZTbHPDoOAAa2ylRpvRhsQl6nYAuM4bjvtQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE1TYM52t4C1WCPVfZUD5JmfcSmIKb9AS1qDMTyYc7i5LJ6SumWRItEDWv1PV6+UwQnxbNYHQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1a4b:b0:3a0:9a32:dedc with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-3a4d594546fmr39487035ab.6.1729701977560; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 09:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 41be03b00d2f7-7eaeabb83easm7109354a12.72.2024.10.23.09.46.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 23 Oct 2024 09:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 09:46:14 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Erez Shitrit , Alex Vesker , dsosnowski@nvidia.com, viacheslavo@nvidia.com, bingz@nvidia.com, orika@nvidia.com, suanmingm@nvidia.com, matan@nvidia.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: mlx5 using pthread_spinlock() Message-ID: <20241023094614.2852f3d5@hermes.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Why is the mlx5 driver using pthread_spinlock() instead of DPDK spinlock? It is only driver doing this (always a red flag).