DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <rasland@nvidia.com>, <matan@nvidia.com>, <suanmingm@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] doc: virtual function MTU settings has no meaning
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:45:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241028144509.1612033-1-viacheslavo@nvidia.com> (raw)

There is the mlx5 NIC limitations - configuring MTU
for PCI Virtual Function has no meaning. The actual maximal
packet size in VF's receiving is limited by MTU configured
on the related PCI Physical Function, the DPDK datapath
running over VF should be prepared to handle packets
of this maximal size.

Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
---
 doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst b/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
index 8d1a1311d4..c7dcb74da7 100644
--- a/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
@@ -191,6 +191,13 @@ Limitations
     - IPv4/TCP with CVLAN filtering
     - L4 steering rules for port RSS of UDP, TCP and IP
 
+- PCI Virtual Function MTU:
+
+  Configuring MTU for PCI Virtual Function has no meaning.
+  The actual maximal packet size in VF's receiving is limited by MTU configured
+  on the related PCI Physical Function, the DPDK datapath running over VF should be
+  prepared to handle packets of this maximal size.
+
 - For secondary process:
 
   - Forked secondary process not supported.
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2024-10-28 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-28 14:45 Viacheslav Ovsiienko [this message]
2024-10-28 15:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-28 17:05   ` Slava Ovsiienko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241028144509.1612033-1-viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    --to=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
    --cc=suanmingm@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).