From: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>, <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
<bruce.richardson@intel.com>, <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
<dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>, <jerinj@marvell.com>
Cc: <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>, <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>,
<anatoly.burakov@intel.com>, <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
<ferruh.yigit@amd.com>, <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
<wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>, <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
Subject: [RFC v2 0/3] Introduce Topology NUMA grouping for lcores
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 10:10:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241030044035.1201-1-vipin.varghese@amd.com> (raw)
One of the way to increase core density in a given physical package is
to use easy to replicate tiles. These tiles are either core complexes or
core complexes with IO (memory and PCIe). This results to possibility of
having two types NUMA topology.
- CPU topology & IO topology
- CPU+IO topology
For platforms like
- AMD SoC EPYC, core complexes are in separate CPU domain and IO
are in different NUMA domain (except for zen1 Naples)
- Intel 4th Xeon (SPR) & above, the CPU+IO NUMA partitioning is
achieved by BIOS option `SNC as 1, 2 or 4`.
- Ampere One allow CPU NUMA paritioning by BIOS option `SLC`.
- while other platforms has 2 or 4 cores sharing same L2 cache.
Grouping DPDK logical cores within the same Cache and IO, helps to
leverage application same cache or IO locality. For applications to
leverage cache or IO locality, ones needs to use lcores sharing same
topology. This approach ensures more consistent latencies by
minimizing the dispersion of lcores across different tiles.
Using lcores in same NUMA domain shows imporvement for applications
- using pipline staging
- each lcore processing part of payload
- eventual hit in either L2 or L3
Library dependency: hwloc
Topology Flags:
---------------
- RTE_LCORE_DOMAIN_L1: to group cores sharing same L1 cache
- RTE_LCORE_DOMAIN_SMT: same as RTE_LCORE_DOMAIN_L1
- RTE_LCORE_DOMAIN_L2: group cores sharing same L2 cache
- RTE_LCORE_DOMAIN_L3: group cores sharing same L3 cache
- RTE_LCORE_DOMAIN_IO: group cores sharing same IO
< Function: Purpose >
---------------------
- rte_get_domain_count: get domain count based on Topology Flag
- rte_lcore_count_from_domain: get valid lcores count under each domain
- rte_get_lcore_in_domain: valid lcore id based on index
- rte_get_next_lcore_from_domain: next valid lcore within domain
- rte_get_next_lcore_from_next_domain: next valid lcore from next domain
Note:
1. Topology is NUMA grouping.
2. Domain is various sub-groups within a specific Topology.
Topology example: L1, L2, L3, IO
Domian example: IO-A, IO-B
< MACRO: Purpose >
------------------
- RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_DOMAIN: iterate lcores from all domains
- RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_WORKER_DOMAIN: iterate worker lcores from all domains
- RTE_LCORE_FORN_NEXT_DOMAIN: iterate domain select n'th lcore
- RTE_LCORE_FORN_WORKER_NEXT_DOMAIN: iterate domain for worker n'th lcore.
Future work (after merge):
--------------------------
- dma-perf per IO NUMA
- eventdev per L3 NUMA
- pipeline per SMT|L3 NUMA
- distributor per L3 for Port-Queue
- l2fwd-power per SMT
- testpmd option for IO NUMA per port
Platform tested on:
-------------------
- INTEL(R) XEON(R) PLATINUM 8562Y+ (support IO numa 1 & 2)
- AMD EPYC 8534P (supports IO numa 1 & 2)
- AMD EPYC 9554 (supports IO numa 1, 2, 4)
Logs:
-----
1. INTEL(R) XEON(R) PLATINUM 8562Y+:
- SNC=1
Domain (IO): at index (0) there are 48 core, with (0) at index 0
- SNC=2
Domain (IO): at index (0) there are 24 core, with (0) at index 0
Domain (IO): at index (1) there are 24 core, with (12) at index 0
2. AMD EPYC 8534P:
- NPS=1:
Domain (IO): at index (0) there are 128 core, with (0) at index 0
- NPS=2:
Domain (IO): at index (0) there are 64 core, with (0) at index 0
Domain (IO): at index (1) there are 64 core, with (32) at index 0
Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
Vipin Varghese (3):
eal/lcore: add topology based functions
test/lcore: enable tests for topology
examples: add lcore topology API calls
app/test/test_lcores.c | 189 ++++++++++
config/meson.build | 18 +
examples/helloworld/main.c | 142 +++++++-
examples/l2fwd/main.c | 56 ++-
examples/skeleton/basicfwd.c | 22 ++
lib/eal/common/eal_common_lcore.c | 580 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/eal/common/eal_private.h | 48 +++
lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c | 10 +
lib/eal/include/rte_lcore.h | 168 +++++++++
lib/eal/linux/eal.c | 11 +
lib/eal/meson.build | 4 +
lib/eal/version.map | 9 +
lib/eal/windows/eal.c | 12 +
13 files changed, 1259 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-10-30 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-30 4:40 Vipin Varghese [this message]
2024-10-30 4:40 ` [RFC v2 1/3] eal/lcore: add topology based functions Vipin Varghese
2024-10-30 4:40 ` [RFC v2 2/3] test/lcore: enable tests for topology Vipin Varghese
2024-10-30 4:40 ` [RFC v2 3/3] examples: add lcore topology API calls Vipin Varghese
2024-10-30 6:47 ` [RFC v2 0/3] Introduce Topology NUMA grouping for lcores Mattias Rönnblom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241030044035.1201-1-vipin.varghese@amd.com \
--to=vipin.varghese@amd.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=wathsala.vithanage@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).