From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAAD45E92; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:24:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBDA4068E; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:24:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pg1-f177.google.com (mail-pg1-f177.google.com [209.85.215.177]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8249400D5 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:24:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg1-f177.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-7fd49d85f82so1647789a12.3 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:24:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1734110692; x=1734715492; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=rsfXH4klSi0Ne6lIfnzx+qoLmlSIAxQbYeCl72K/jbg=; b=yKgD1rzTgQSfLCw0s3eisoFJ2mI4ic9GQlSoKalH2Io6Fl8mSn2dxvvs63SYLfTY9+ o2vWx4mRDSCPkV7qIHzTG6c7T9zu5wLN/qZ9JGBwu2h3k71tWzm9fgRW3dulwjIgbJ65 Xwzv2l3yOBeKpAXGLIAQBkouSByTchHu8FSU25HdOg7k2QBreRCCnDKqv33fEu4UVHZw 6QtcpLkG5DA/YV5ZsgDEbH6uZT5UJ8G3aK1N+48Ana9sLz228Pz68xGV5puRe8xfWZfo cNwxu/7im+xJ/E8kgoBEyiZLSMqJn7oyAZrZRpbRhmNKJb/ah5JPJCuVe99RRzFQ43LX ekqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1734110692; x=1734715492; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rsfXH4klSi0Ne6lIfnzx+qoLmlSIAxQbYeCl72K/jbg=; b=N2PZNJ90nNV5DExeVNrhmZ/aL4cDpgW2T595RaT0VSKV3BzD9Zeo2h3A5mnLcAR0IL v1PtScm1zS2Z/cLCVBaynTkQtUCOAo7IAaxbw19UiGW3nE+NErBZwrsRrmGwECJ2FSLH v6d6eitZxAUsxWgvUO5dc87MYaP8cPlE68eNhNTwfmVfs7ws1TzKyrjPAMZ8hhH6oxOt 9Epo2bE61TMVMhXgDYLnXwtSKPDgeDbjgKghTDoqO/2tJnIILdZl3XT3/V4LL6vkRr7y AoM5SQRr3ti2rYJISchudj2TM6rqSgVfvQ+ygKYap2Eg/MwRV0EJWwTNmZaAZgThYoQw O1ow== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxs4th2S3B3kWAF+KvaAB4BqquKfyfhiVONhwOZ2ToVrnJVdq0W mh4ZMukljVRAF1oed7tyWJGHEone5mH2jDGyh2zTP84TVUvcbEwtMoIU0hE43DA= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctJZ3GXHJkoEH+aKTKhUFuAMWqL+LsvJJ+lDQPQlS2s7GvUDqnz/JqxyE1Evcy OML77Ig+vp/s+MmZ6iZfNKIsRQUID+7tZB2s07kZMOmvpgX/JDXY3Dsy8AD5DWRhCXlDkUIvd1g MwbVKjZHl8cAj2+NVDU78D5jPjuxJ5IE6mh/72hOk9n7A/P7shS5+ihB6zcg3BBpaMqCX0/UPdi agFTmX6Mgf8gjlXx9wistjcDDY/zPd260VTZl0TWI+ZwymHVlyKxoSD36YOI78x8x7UsqxGIr18 zTrOYYMGEGc5X2U40pgeF0xkSOPU6LhX0A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFuDYTJjKBt5KBe4els0LYypDrhDg2uljobZu6UTxS4AS8ioVToHIQjsvqsf9x5z6GBpAbvAg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d406:b0:2ee:5958:828 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f28fb66808mr5429459a91.9.1734110691810; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:24:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f2a1e7e07bsm32129a91.1.2024.12.13.09.24.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:24:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 08:56:00 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: "lihuisong (C)" Cc: , , Chas Williams , "Min Hu (Connor)" , Chengwen Feng , "Bruce Richardson" Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/bonding: fix active backup rx test Message-ID: <20241213085545.30b86af1@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <8e824f6a-b271-1b2d-9a27-aed5cd27cb8f@huawei.com> References: <20241213015158.10174-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <8e824f6a-b271-1b2d-9a27-aed5cd27cb8f@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 14:57:23 +0800 "lihuisong (C)" wrote: > Hi Stephen, >=20 > This patch looks good to me. >=20 > But this test case still runs failure when I run "link_bonding_autotest"= =20 > twice. like: > --> =20 > ... > EAL: Test assert configure_ethdev line 181 failed: rte_eth_dev_configure= =20 > for port 7 failed > EAL: Test assert initialize_bonding_device_with_members line 1138=20 > failed: Failed to configure bonding port (7) in mode 3 with (4) members. > EAL: Test assert=20 > test_broadcast_verify_member_link_status_change_behaviour line 4060=20 > failed: Failed to initialise bonding device > =C2=A0+ TestCase [62] :=20 > test_broadcast_verify_member_link_status_change_behaviour failed > ETHDEV: Invalid port_id=3D7 > EAL: Test assert configure_ethdev line 181 failed: rte_eth_dev_configure= =20 > for port 7 failed > EAL: Test assert test_reconfigure_bonding_device line 4162 failed:=20 > failed to reconfigure bonding device > =C2=A0+ TestCase [63] : test_reconfigure_bonding_device failed > ETHDEV: Invalid port_id=3D7 > =C2=A0+ TestCase [64] : test_close_bonding_device succeeded > ETHDEV: Invalid port_id=3D7 > EAL: Test assert remove_members_and_stop_bonding_device line 659 failed:= =20 > Failed to stop bonding port 7 > =C2=A0+ ------------------------------------------------------- + > =C2=A0+ Test Suite Summary : Link Bonding Unit Test Suite > =C2=A0+ ------------------------------------------------------- + > =C2=A0+ Tests Total :=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 65 > =C2=A0+ Tests Skipped :=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0 > =C2=A0+ Tests Executed :=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 65 > =C2=A0+ Tests Unsupported:=C2=A0=C2=A0 0 > =C2=A0+ Tests Passed :=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 5 > =C2=A0+ Tests Failed :=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 60 > =C2=A0+ ------------------------------------------------------- + > Test Failed >=20 >=20 > I guess the bonding use case needs to close all bonding devices. The test has lots of issues that would make it bad to run twice. Like leaking mbufs, etc. But these always existed and will leave that to bonding maintainers to fix.