From: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
To: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/test: fix stack overflow in lpm6_perf_autotest
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:05:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241213170550.GA2941@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aac21b6c-c0ee-4cb1-8d88-1880592c9085@intel.com>
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:22:20AM +0000, Medvedkin, Vladimir wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 13/12/2024 02:39, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> >Test lpm6_perf_autotest was hitting a stack overflow on Windows
> >with both MSVC and Clang.
> >
> >The fix is to move some of the data from the stack to the heap.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
> >---
> > app/test/test_lpm6_perf.c | 11 +++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm6_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm6_perf.c
> >index 1860a99ed6..8231ad825d 100644
> >--- a/app/test/test_lpm6_perf.c
> >+++ b/app/test/test_lpm6_perf.c
> >@@ -117,8 +117,12 @@ test_lpm6_perf(void)
> > total_time = 0;
> > count = 0;
> >- struct rte_ipv6_addr ip_batch[NUM_IPS_ENTRIES];
> >- int32_t next_hops[NUM_IPS_ENTRIES];
> >+ struct rte_ipv6_addr *ip_batch = (struct rte_ipv6_addr *)malloc(
> why not rte_malloc?
For no good reason :-)
I'll update the patch.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Andre Muezerie
> >+ sizeof(struct rte_ipv6_addr) * NUM_IPS_ENTRIES);
> >+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(ip_batch != NULL);
> >+
> >+ int32_t *next_hops = (int32_t *)malloc(sizeof(int32_t) * NUM_IPS_ENTRIES);
> >+ TEST_LPM_ASSERT(next_hops != NULL);
> > for (i = 0; i < NUM_IPS_ENTRIES; i++)
> > ip_batch[i] = large_ips_table[i].ip;
> >@@ -153,6 +157,9 @@ test_lpm6_perf(void)
> > printf("Average LPM Delete: %g cycles\n",
> > (double)total_time / NUM_ROUTE_ENTRIES);
> >+ free(next_hops);
> >+ free(ip_batch);
> >+
> > rte_lpm6_delete_all(lpm);
> > rte_lpm6_free(lpm);
>
> --
> Regards,
> Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-13 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-13 2:39 Andre Muezerie
2024-12-13 10:22 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2024-12-13 17:05 ` Andre Muezerie [this message]
2024-12-13 17:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-12-13 17:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-13 17:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-12-18 15:12 ` Andre Muezerie
2024-12-18 15:21 ` [PATCH v3] " Andre Muezerie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241213170550.GA2941@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net \
--to=andremue@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).