From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A37D46077; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 20:11:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A42402DF; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 20:11:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pj1-f43.google.com (mail-pj1-f43.google.com [209.85.216.43]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BE44029F for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 20:11:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pj1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2ee74291415so6229747a91.3 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:11:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1736795512; x=1737400312; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=SWkvIf28wRymHffX0XrKUse8o5Aqi1U5ugOOP816HrU=; b=rnVShP8fddIs3A6+k1O2t/t88DwDLCt1gYxy8Fb7cP8jOk/Oaz61mU2IGReIkkFt2v 0ulBiHu1nuqaMKm7sry+M8rXGaBgycncO1E9sSj/QdanPG4ZGKgeA6JGCEb58VQGq8O9 MnFwhpgmmL5uqPPofDK4uh3N0HeI7hExlekkr9Pavrzsf34Wy4I8L3+x0TQ1KU28UBZg +FMtX88vW+mHHn0N9IMAU6GqI5vs5jrfioaAUEK5fPjMarMvC+DOyVV1M4zdHVDAUe48 mTEZgDs+mJjgA4eR6woVLmAXwiMDyjQnYlcxdoG1p+VneATXgvLlF34YlPW+5KLqG3cv 9dXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1736795512; x=1737400312; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SWkvIf28wRymHffX0XrKUse8o5Aqi1U5ugOOP816HrU=; b=uPgRECm4PVZk+Sr4h52xh0qP+9JX1OdyzbbP8/BXQIZesLT2wE3xvy7MJetSmp1ZAF eMZKNDmKXJ9RwGdvbI3F6vBHcI3dzwfnC9175f41fwbytkkIS6ZfHy04B7oyYdIkNLdS x9iQJ7n6NKKtyrKmLOXHHF9yCBkJ1xrZH7Citm9OwfepVAZXXpNH3hBRz9yARRm8hTL5 VLBlcDKEEspHKAYu4ftX5120VOqIZ1jZfaRBWDQNyHJlUjkd5RumNpVpJ1YGZlzu15Pp oZbxy1MBj7D00nH0FPsmmRDBQ5Kbv1ldUZoXoihQf7gQFN8axGzUwU4vmkHq7sNuVYTy m2FQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw0UtkdAhVCo04he6OUk8oSwdJs08jcjmVboLKkWVJiTEtt5xCX WUi1KC9wXYANpO2UOGP/yL1TbMCDVdFiHIUD0wM8t/LctNO45gk163WJk5M+NI8= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu7/xE3pzw4QpgW6LQ4UCkyOhZoZ3rDdlZZgDJI4VDh5OgNrUycJG694EYY0pR qqCkUwSO9kYrUVi0k3EA3YaR3aosm9oOm6xCuCJh188zO7tJa/pvoH60wWEPCnk2t0lMnoWBLM/ d/NHdslhPhVnq3DC0vMjl+bZ+hljf1uZgQpUB+T185kcSqU1rIKPYnxcIfLidgm9jt/uMaR11ZS kRb0IZ+BQfe7QRg3VMVeIjee3DUqFLn+6OkoYiTy2poXxsHhpZxq15Gd1269slujFwrtmUYwink KrduDH2b4SN+u14vHBJluHic/APDmAaZUA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEtNgH6MO6t4euFpSTL98nxm3dAU9VzxkKPVAKLYOxxYPd29tUYbgyZKRF9WCD9Bkv0nBPpAg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e18f:b0:2ee:7538:be70 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f548ea569bmr28821667a91.5.1736795510861; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:11:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f5593d0911sm9005139a91.8.2025.01.13.11.11.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:11:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:11:41 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Ariel Otilibili Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon , David Marchand , Maxime Coquelin , Chenbo Xia , Ziyang Xuan , Xiaoyun Wang , Gaetan Rivet , Nithin Dabilpuram , Kiran Kumar K , Sunil Kumar Kori , Satha Rao , Harman Kalra , Ajit Khaparde , Somnath Kotur , Rosen Xu Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] remove check around pthread_mutex_init() Message-ID: <20250113111141.45778d7d@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20250112202021.179634-1-otilibil@eurecom.fr> References: <20250112185842.9752-1-otilibil@eurecom.fr> <20250112202021.179634-1-otilibil@eurecom.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:20:15 +0100 Ariel Otilibili wrote: > Hello, > > This series addresses Bugzilla ID 1586; the man says > > > pthread_mutex_init always returns 0. The other mutex functions > > return 0 on success and a non-zero error code on error. > > Meaning, the check around around pthread_mutex_init() is needless. > > Thank you, > > Link: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/pthread_mutex_lock.3.html > Bugzilla ID: 1586 LGTM Series-Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger