From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778D946085; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 04:53:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6214B402EB; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 04:53:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.190]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC474003C for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 04:53:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.214]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4YXsSz6BNyz2DkQj; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:49:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [10.1.198.66]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE5CE1A016C; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:53:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemn100009.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.112) by dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:53:05 +0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.28.79.22) by kwepemn100009.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:53:05 +0800 From: Huisong Li To: CC: , , , Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] ethdev: clarify something about new event Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:41:08 +0800 Message-ID: <20250115034110.15245-1-lihuisong@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.28.79.22] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To kwepemn100009.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.112) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org I've had some issues when I add the verification of the port id in the event callback, which are discussed in another patch series[1]. So this series clarify something about RTE_ETH_EVENT_NEW based on the previous discussion. [1] https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20250113025521.32703-1-lihuisong@huawei.com/ Huisong Li (2): ethdev: clarify do not something in the new event ethdev: fix some APIs can be used in the new event lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 14 +++++++++++--- lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 9 ++++++++- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- 2.22.0