DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] Add attributes to allocation functions
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 10:42:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250120104254.74828cb1@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z46YtRw2Be8gxB8a@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 18:40:53 +0000
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 10:03:18AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > This patch series builds on the allocation function attributes
> > added in 24.11 release. These annotations will allow for compiler
> > to flag cases where a pointer is allocated with one function
> > but incorrectly passed to a different free function.
> > 
> > Checkpatch perl script falsely complains in a couple patches
> > because it doesn't really understand C syntax for attributes.
> >   
> 
> Looking at the patchset, I see a number of functions moved in files. Is
> there a restriction on the placement of the alloc and free functions where
> free has to be defined first?
> 
> /Bruce

Yes the function prototype must be defined before it can be used.

      reply	other threads:[~2025-01-20 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-20 18:03 Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 01/15] fib: add allocation function attributes Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 02/15] rib: annotate rib allocation functions Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 03/15] hash: add allocation function attributes Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 04/15] lpm: " Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 05/15] pipeline: " Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 06/15] acl: " Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 07/15] bitratestats: " Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 08/15] member: " Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 09/15] mempool: " Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 10/15] eventdev: " Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 11/15] ring: " Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 12/15] reorder: " Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 13/15] compressdev: " Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 14/15] telemetry: " Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:43   ` Bruce Richardson
2025-01-20 18:03 ` [PATCH 15/15] sched: " Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-20 18:40 ` [PATCH 00/15] Add attributes to allocation functions Bruce Richardson
2025-01-20 18:42   ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250120104254.74828cb1@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).