DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Serhii Iliushyk <sil-plv@napatech.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: mko-plv@napatech.com, sil-plv@napatech.com, ckm@napatech.com,
	stephen@networkplumber.org,
	Danylo Vodopianov <dvo-plv@napatech.com>,
	Oleksandr Kolomeiets <okl-plv@napatech.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 04/31] net/ntnic: add array index verification
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 18:07:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250121170814.3252171-5-sil-plv@napatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250121170814.3252171-1-sil-plv@napatech.com>

From: Danylo Vodopianov <dvo-plv@napatech.com>

CI found couple coverity problems which were fixed in this commit.

CID: 448983, 448980
Memory - corruptions  (OVERRUN)

Add check both indices within bounds before calling the macro

Coverity issue: 448983
Fixes: 6e8b7f11205f ("net/ntnic: add categorizer (CAT) FPGA module")

Signed-off-by: Danylo Vodopianov <dvo-plv@napatech.com>
---
 .../ntnic/nthw/flow_api/hw_mod/hw_mod_hsh.c    | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 .../ntnic/nthw/flow_api/hw_mod/hw_mod_pdb.c    | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/flow_api/hw_mod/hw_mod_hsh.c b/drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/flow_api/hw_mod/hw_mod_hsh.c
index 1750d09afb..cc8db2fae5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/flow_api/hw_mod/hw_mod_hsh.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/flow_api/hw_mod/hw_mod_hsh.c
@@ -121,8 +121,23 @@ static int hw_mod_hsh_rcp_mod(struct flow_api_backend_s *be, enum hw_hsh_e field
 				INDEX_TOO_LARGE_LOG;
 				return INDEX_TOO_LARGE;
 			}
+			/* Size of the structure */
+			size_t element_size = sizeof(struct hsh_v5_rcp_s);
+			/* Size of the buffer */
+			size_t buffer_size = sizeof(be->hsh.v5.rcp);
 
-			DO_COMPARE_INDEXS(be->hsh.v5.rcp, struct hsh_v5_rcp_s, index, word_off);
+			/* Calculate the maximum valid index (number of elements in the buffer) */
+			size_t max_idx = buffer_size / element_size;
+
+			/* Check that both indices are within bounds before calling the macro */
+			if (index < max_idx && word_off < max_idx) {
+				DO_COMPARE_INDEXS(be->hsh.v5.rcp, struct hsh_v5_rcp_s, index,
+					word_off);
+
+			} else {
+				INDEX_TOO_LARGE_LOG;
+				return INDEX_TOO_LARGE;
+			}
 			break;
 
 		case HW_HSH_RCP_FIND:
diff --git a/drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/flow_api/hw_mod/hw_mod_pdb.c b/drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/flow_api/hw_mod/hw_mod_pdb.c
index 59285405ba..147a06ac2b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/flow_api/hw_mod/hw_mod_pdb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ntnic/nthw/flow_api/hw_mod/hw_mod_pdb.c
@@ -131,8 +131,22 @@ static int hw_mod_pdb_rcp_mod(struct flow_api_backend_s *be, enum hw_pdb_e field
 				INDEX_TOO_LARGE_LOG;
 				return INDEX_TOO_LARGE;
 			}
-
-			DO_COMPARE_INDEXS(be->pdb.v9.rcp, struct pdb_v9_rcp_s, index, *value);
+			/* Size of the structure */
+			size_t element_size = sizeof(struct pdb_v9_rcp_s);
+			/* Size of the buffer */
+			size_t buffer_size = sizeof(be->pdb.v9.rcp);
+
+			/* Calculate the maximum valid index (number of elements in the buffer) */
+			size_t max_idx = buffer_size / element_size;
+
+			/* Check that both indices are within bounds before calling the macro */
+			if (index < max_idx && *value < max_idx) {
+				DO_COMPARE_INDEXS(be->pdb.v9.rcp, struct pdb_v9_rcp_s, index,
+					*value);
+			} else {
+				INDEX_TOO_LARGE_LOG;
+				return INDEX_TOO_LARGE;
+			}
 			break;
 
 		case HW_PDB_RCP_DESCRIPTOR:
-- 
2.45.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-21 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-21 17:07 [PATCH v1 00/31] net/ntnic: bugfixes and refactoring Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 01/31] net/ntnic: fix index verification Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 02/31] net/ntnic: add thread check return code Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 18:24   ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 03/31] net/ntnic: add return code handling Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 18:30   ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-21 17:07 ` Serhii Iliushyk [this message]
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 05/31] net/ntnic: fix realloc memory leak Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 06/31] net/ntnic: fix array index verification Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 07/31] net/ntnic: add var definition transparently Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 08/31] net/ntnic: add proper var freed Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 09/31] net/ntnic: remove deadcode Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 10/31] net/ntnic: fix potentially overflow Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 11/31] net/ntnic: add null checking Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 12/31] net/ntnic: fix overflow issue Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 13/31] net/ntnic: fix untrusted loop bound Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 14/31] net/ntnic: add null checking Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 15/31] net/ntnic: move " Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 16/31] net/ntnic: fix var size Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 17/31] net/ntnic: fix var overflow Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 18/31] net/ntnic: remove dead code Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 19/31] net/ntnic: remove convert error func Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 20/31] net/ntnic: fix array verification Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:07 ` [PATCH v1 21/31] net/ntnic: fix memory leak Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:08 ` [PATCH v1 22/31] net/ntnic: remove extra address-of operator Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:08 ` [PATCH v1 23/31] net/ntnic: remove extra check for null Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:08 ` [PATCH v1 24/31] net/ntnic: remove unused code Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:08 ` [PATCH v1 25/31] net/ntnic: refactor RSS implementation Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:08 ` [PATCH v1 26/31] net/ntnic: fix age timeout recalculation into fpga unit Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:08 ` [PATCH v1 27/31] net/ntnic: rework age event generation Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:08 ` [PATCH v1 28/31] net/ntnic: fix group print Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:08 ` [PATCH v1 29/31] net/ntnic: extend module mapping Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:08 ` [PATCH v1 30/31] net/ntnic: refactoring of the FPGA initialization Serhii Iliushyk
2025-01-21 17:08 ` [PATCH v1 31/31] net/ntnic: remove tag EXPERIMENTAL Serhii Iliushyk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250121170814.3252171-5-sil-plv@napatech.com \
    --to=sil-plv@napatech.com \
    --cc=ckm@napatech.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dvo-plv@napatech.com \
    --cc=mko-plv@napatech.com \
    --cc=okl-plv@napatech.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).