From: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, fanzhang.oss@gmail.com, gakhil@marvell.com,
Kai Ji <kai.ji@intel.com>, Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
Tejasree Kondoj <ktejasree@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] lib/cryptodev: avoid implicit conversion to 64 bit number
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 11:36:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250127193620.GA17281@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F9F6@smartserver.smartshare.dk>
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 06:14:47PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Andre Muezerie [mailto:andremue@linux.microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Monday, 27 January 2025 17.04
> >
> > MSVC issues the warning below:
> >
> > ../lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c(623): warning C4334: '<<':
> > result of 32-bit shift implicitly converted to 64 bits
> > (was 64-bit shift intended?)
> >
> > The code would be better off by using 64 bit numbers to begin with.
> > That eliminates the need for a conversion to 64 bits later.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
> > Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> > ---
> > lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> > b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> > index 85a4b46ac9..a49b0662f3 100644
> > --- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> > +++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> > @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_asym_xform_capability_check_hash(
> > {
> > bool ret = false;
> >
> > - if (capability->hash_algos & (1 << hash))
> > + if (capability->hash_algos & RTE_BIT64(hash))
> > ret = true;
>
> If I'm not mistaken, the last of the hash enums RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_SM3_HMAC has the value 32, so this patch actually fixes a bug.
> If you agree with my analysis, a Fixes tag should be added, so the patch can be backported. (RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_SM3_HMAC also exists in previous DPDK versions.)
>
> Furthermore, driver initializations of hash_algos should also use RTE_BIT64():
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/dpdk/v24.11.1/C/ident/hash_algos
> Specifically, OpenSSL and CNXK crypto drivers have the same bug, and need to be fixed too:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/dpdk/v24.11.1/source/drivers/crypto/openssl/rte_openssl_pmd_ops.c#L633
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/dpdk/v24.11.1/source/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_cryptodev_capabilities.c#L1210
>
> With Fixes tag added,
> Reviewed-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Great observation. I agree that this is indeed fixing a bug.
I also fixed the two drivers as suggested and sent out v3 of this series.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-27 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-28 1:53 [PATCH " Andre Muezerie
2024-11-28 1:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] lib/hash: " Andre Muezerie
2025-01-22 16:12 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-01-22 21:36 ` Andre Muezerie
2025-01-23 7:55 ` Morten Brørup
2025-01-23 17:42 ` Andre Muezerie
2025-01-25 12:56 ` Morten Brørup
2025-01-22 16:15 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2025-01-08 10:28 ` [EXTERNAL] [PATCH 1/2] lib/cryptodev: " Akhil Goyal
2025-01-27 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 " Andre Muezerie
2025-01-27 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/hash: " Andre Muezerie
2025-01-27 17:16 ` Morten Brørup
2025-01-27 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] lib/cryptodev: " Morten Brørup
2025-01-27 19:36 ` Andre Muezerie [this message]
2025-01-27 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] " Andre Muezerie
2025-01-27 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] lib/hash: " Andre Muezerie
2025-01-27 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] drivers/crypto: use RTE_BIT64 in initializations of hash_algos Andre Muezerie
2025-01-28 7:45 ` Morten Brørup
2025-01-28 7:49 ` Anoob Joseph
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250127193620.GA17281@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net \
--to=andremue@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fanzhang.oss@gmail.com \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=kai.ji@intel.com \
--cc=ktejasree@marvell.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).