From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>,
Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>,
Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] trace: fix undefined behavior in register
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 11:10:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250130111043.76b8cd2c@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250130145849.82003-3-david.marchand@redhat.com>
On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:58:49 +0100
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> Registering a tracepoint handler was resulting so far in undefined
> behavior at runtime.
>
> The RTE_TRACE_POINT_REGISTER() macro was casting the tracepoint handler
> (which expects arguments) to a void (*)(void).
> At runtime, calling this handler while registering resulted in
> reading the current stack with no relation to this function prototype.
>
> Instead, declare an additional inline _register() handler for each
> tracepoint and make sure that the emitting macros in
> rte_trace_point_register.h only work on arguments name and type.
>
> The original tracepoint handler prototype is adjusted by adding a
> __rte_unused for each argument (since emitting macros do nothing
> with them).
> This last part introduces an implementation limit of 15 arguments.
>
> With this change in place, the workaround in dmadev tracepoints can be
> removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
When I build with -Db_santize=undefined the following warning shows up.
It seems related.
In function ‘rte_ethdev_trace_get_dcb_info’,
inlined from ‘rte_eth_dev_get_dcb_info’ at ../lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c:6720:2:
../lib/eal/include/rte_trace_point.h:381:9: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
381 | memcpy(mem, &(in), sizeof(in)); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../lib/eal/include/rte_trace_point.h:53:9: note: in definition of macro ‘__RTE_TRACE_POINT’
53 | __VA_ARGS__ \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
../lib/ethdev/ethdev_trace.h:1213:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘RTE_TRACE_POINT’
1213 | RTE_TRACE_POINT(
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../lib/eal/include/rte_trace_point.h:399:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘__rte_trace_point_emit’
399 | __rte_trace_point_emit(len, uint8_t); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../lib/ethdev/ethdev_trace.h:1223:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘rte_trace_point_emit_blob’
1223 | rte_trace_point_emit_blob(dcb_info->tc_bws, num_tcs);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In function ‘rte_eth_dev_get_dcb_info’:
cc1: note: destination object is likely at address zero
In function ‘rte_ethdev_trace_get_dcb_info’,
inlined from ‘rte_eth_dev_get_dcb_info’ at ../lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c:6720:2:
../lib/eal/include/rte_trace_point.h:401:9: warning: ‘memset’ offset [0, 55] is out of the bounds [0, 0] [-Warray-bounds=]
401 | memset(RTE_PTR_ADD(mem, len), 0, RTE_TRACE_BLOB_LEN_MAX - len); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../lib/eal/include/rte_trace_point.h:53:9: note: in definition of macro ‘__RTE_TRACE_POINT’
53 | __VA_ARGS__ \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
../lib/ethdev/ethdev_trace.h:1213:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘RTE_TRACE_POINT’
1213 | RTE_TRACE_POINT(
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../lib/ethdev/ethdev_trace.h:1222:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘rte_trace_point_emit_blob’
1222 | rte_trace_point_emit_blob(dcb_info->prio_tc, num_user_priorities);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-30 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-24 16:14 [PATCH 1/2] trace: support expression for blob length David Marchand
2025-01-24 16:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] dmadev: avoid copies in tracepoints David Marchand
2025-01-27 8:25 ` [EXTERNAL] [PATCH 1/2] trace: support expression for blob length Jerin Jacob
2025-01-30 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " David Marchand
2025-01-30 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dmadev: avoid copies in tracepoints David Marchand
2025-01-30 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] trace: fix undefined behavior in register David Marchand
2025-01-30 19:10 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2025-01-30 21:06 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250130111043.76b8cd2c@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=kevin.laatz@intel.com \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=skori@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).