From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>, <jerinj@marvell.com>,
<hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>, <drc@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/4] ring: fix potential sync issue between head and tail values
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 12:14:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250521111432.207936-4-konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250521111432.207936-1-konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
This patch aims several purposes:
- provide an alternative (and I think a better) way to fix the
issue discussed in previous patch:
"ring/soring: fix synchronization issue between head and tail values"
- make sure that such problem wouldn’t happen within other usages of
__rte_ring_headtail_move_head() – both current rte_ring
implementation and possible future use-cases.
- step towards unification of move_head() implementations and
removing rte_ring_generic_pvt.h
It uses Acquire-Release memory ordering for CAS operation in move_head().
That guarantees that corresponding ‘tail’ updates will be visible
before current ‘head’ is updated.
As I said before: I think that in theory the problem described in
previous patch might happen with our conventional rte_ring too
(when RTE_USE_C11_MEM_MODEL enabled).
But, so far I didn’t manage to reproduce it in reality.
For that reason and also because it touches a critical rte_ring code-path,
I put these changes into a separate patch. Expect all interested
stakeholders to come-up with their comments and observations.
Regarding performance impact – on my boxes both ring_perf_autotest and
ring_stress_autotest – show a mixed set of results: some of them become
few cycles faster, another few cycles slower.
But so far, I didn’t notice any real degradations with that patch.
Fixes: b5458e2cc483 ("ring: introduce staged ordered ring")
Fixes: 1cc363b8ce06 ("ring: introduce HTS ring mode")
Fixes: e6ba4731c0f3 ("ring: introduce RTS ring mode")
Fixes: 49594a63147a ("ring/c11: relax ordering for load and store of the head")
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
---
lib/ring/rte_ring_c11_pvt.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
lib/ring/rte_ring_hts_elem_pvt.h | 6 ++++--
lib/ring/rte_ring_rts_elem_pvt.h | 6 ++++--
lib/ring/soring.c | 5 -----
4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/ring/rte_ring_c11_pvt.h b/lib/ring/rte_ring_c11_pvt.h
index 0845cd6dcf..6d1c46df9a 100644
--- a/lib/ring/rte_ring_c11_pvt.h
+++ b/lib/ring/rte_ring_c11_pvt.h
@@ -77,20 +77,19 @@ __rte_ring_headtail_move_head(struct rte_ring_headtail *d,
int success;
unsigned int max = n;
+ /* Ensure the head is read before tail */
*old_head = rte_atomic_load_explicit(&d->head,
- rte_memory_order_relaxed);
+ rte_memory_order_acquire);
do {
/* Reset n to the initial burst count */
n = max;
- /* Ensure the head is read before tail */
- rte_atomic_thread_fence(rte_memory_order_acquire);
-
- /* load-acquire synchronize with store-release of ht->tail
- * in update_tail.
+ /*
+ * Read s->tail value. Note that it will be loaded after
+ * d->head load, but before CAS operation for the d->head.
*/
stail = rte_atomic_load_explicit(&s->tail,
- rte_memory_order_acquire);
+ rte_memory_order_relaxed);
/* The subtraction is done between two unsigned 32bits value
* (the result is always modulo 32 bits even if we have
@@ -112,11 +111,19 @@ __rte_ring_headtail_move_head(struct rte_ring_headtail *d,
d->head = *new_head;
success = 1;
} else
- /* on failure, *old_head is updated */
+ /*
+ * on failure, *old_head is updated.
+ * this CAS(ACQ_REL, ACQUIRE) serves as a hoist
+ * barrier to prevent:
+ * - OOO reads of cons tail value
+ * - OOO copy of elems from the ring
+ * Also RELEASE guarantees that latest tail value
+ * will become visible before the new head value.
+ */
success = rte_atomic_compare_exchange_strong_explicit(
&d->head, old_head, *new_head,
- rte_memory_order_relaxed,
- rte_memory_order_relaxed);
+ rte_memory_order_acq_rel,
+ rte_memory_order_acquire);
} while (unlikely(success == 0));
return n;
}
diff --git a/lib/ring/rte_ring_hts_elem_pvt.h b/lib/ring/rte_ring_hts_elem_pvt.h
index c59e5f6420..cc593433b9 100644
--- a/lib/ring/rte_ring_hts_elem_pvt.h
+++ b/lib/ring/rte_ring_hts_elem_pvt.h
@@ -116,13 +116,15 @@ __rte_ring_hts_move_head(struct rte_ring_hts_headtail *d,
np.pos.head = op.pos.head + n;
/*
- * this CAS(ACQUIRE, ACQUIRE) serves as a hoist barrier to prevent:
+ * this CAS(ACQ_REL, ACQUIRE) serves as a hoist barrier to prevent:
* - OOO reads of cons tail value
* - OOO copy of elems from the ring
+ * Also RELEASE guarantees that latest tail value
+ * will become visible before the new head value.
*/
} while (rte_atomic_compare_exchange_strong_explicit(&d->ht.raw,
(uint64_t *)(uintptr_t)&op.raw, np.raw,
- rte_memory_order_acquire,
+ rte_memory_order_acq_rel,
rte_memory_order_acquire) == 0);
*old_head = op.pos.head;
diff --git a/lib/ring/rte_ring_rts_elem_pvt.h b/lib/ring/rte_ring_rts_elem_pvt.h
index 509fa674fb..860b13cc61 100644
--- a/lib/ring/rte_ring_rts_elem_pvt.h
+++ b/lib/ring/rte_ring_rts_elem_pvt.h
@@ -131,13 +131,15 @@ __rte_ring_rts_move_head(struct rte_ring_rts_headtail *d,
nh.val.cnt = oh.val.cnt + 1;
/*
- * this CAS(ACQUIRE, ACQUIRE) serves as a hoist barrier to prevent:
+ * this CAS(ACQ_REL, ACQUIRE) serves as a hoist barrier to prevent:
* - OOO reads of cons tail value
* - OOO copy of elems to the ring
+ * Also RELEASE guarantees that latest tail value
+ * will become visible before the new head value.
*/
} while (rte_atomic_compare_exchange_strong_explicit(&d->head.raw,
(uint64_t *)(uintptr_t)&oh.raw, nh.raw,
- rte_memory_order_acquire,
+ rte_memory_order_acq_rel,
rte_memory_order_acquire) == 0);
*old_head = oh.val.pos;
diff --git a/lib/ring/soring.c b/lib/ring/soring.c
index 7bcbf35516..21a1a27e24 100644
--- a/lib/ring/soring.c
+++ b/lib/ring/soring.c
@@ -123,8 +123,6 @@ __rte_soring_stage_finalize(struct soring_stage_headtail *sht, uint32_t stage,
rte_atomic_store_explicit(&sht->tail.raw, ot.raw,
rte_memory_order_release);
- /* make sure that new tail value is visible */
- rte_atomic_thread_fence(rte_memory_order_release);
return i;
}
@@ -219,9 +217,6 @@ __rte_soring_update_tail(struct __rte_ring_headtail *rht,
/* unsupported mode, shouldn't be here */
RTE_ASSERT(0);
}
-
- /* make sure that new tail value is visible */
- rte_atomic_thread_fence(rte_memory_order_release);
}
static __rte_always_inline uint32_t
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-21 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-21 11:14 [PATCH v1 0/4] ring: some fixes and improvements Konstantin Ananyev
2025-05-21 11:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] ring: introduce extra run-time checks Konstantin Ananyev
2025-05-21 12:14 ` Morten Brørup
2025-05-21 12:34 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-05-21 18:36 ` Morten Brørup
2025-05-21 19:38 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-05-21 22:02 ` Morten Brørup
2025-05-21 11:14 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] ring/soring: fix head-tail synchronization issue Konstantin Ananyev
2025-05-21 11:14 ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]
2025-05-21 20:26 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] ring: fix potential sync issue between head and tail values Morten Brørup
2025-05-21 11:14 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] config/x86: enable RTE_USE_C11_MEM_MODEL by default Konstantin Ananyev
2025-05-21 19:47 ` Morten Brørup
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250521111432.207936-4-konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=drc@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).