From: Danylo Vodopianov <dvo-plv@napatech.com>
To: thomas@monjalon.net, aman.deep.singh@intel.com,
yuying.zhang@intel.com, orika@nvidia.com, mcoqueli@redhat.com,
ckm@napatech.com, matan@mellanox.com, david.marchand@redhat.com,
mko-plv@napatech.com, sil-plv@napatech.com
Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/1] Memory hotplug fix
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 14:31:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250529123102.1875027-1-dvo-plv@napatech.com> (raw)
Hi everyone.
We detected an issue with the memory hotplug feature and virtio devices while working with vitrio
in DPDK.In general, the issue is around the user request VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE and
locking queues for this request
(https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/tree/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c#n1512)
When the vhost_user receives the request VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE, it locks queues only
when the flag lock_all_qps is true(it is always true), AND the flag
VIRTIO_DEV_VDPA_CONFIGURED is not set.
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/tree/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c#n3181
In the case of a memory hot plug, the flag VIRTIO_DEV_VDPA_CONFIGURED is always set,
and due to this, the queues are never locked while they are expected to be locked.
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/tree/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c#n1512.
The quick solution is to add the check for request type and do lock queues always
if we have request VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE. Something like this, in general
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/tree/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c#n3179
if (!(dev->flags & VIRTIO_DEV_VDPA_CONFIGURED) ||
request == VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE) {
...
Danylo Vodopianov (1):
vhost: handle virtqueue locking for memory hotplug
lib/vhost/vhost_user.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.43.5
next reply other threads:[~2025-05-29 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-29 12:31 Danylo Vodopianov [this message]
2025-05-29 12:31 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] vhost: handle virtqueue locking for memory hotplug Danylo Vodopianov
2025-05-29 12:32 [PATCH v1 0/1] Memory hotplug fix Danylo Vodopianov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250529123102.1875027-1-dvo-plv@napatech.com \
--to=dvo-plv@napatech.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=ckm@napatech.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=mcoqueli@redhat.com \
--cc=mko-plv@napatech.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=sil-plv@napatech.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).