DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Khadem Ullah <14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk>
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	dev@dpdk.org, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/ethdev: fix segfault in secondary process by validating dev_private pointer
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 10:38:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250722103824.7c9db0a0@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA++2-x4+3QE+EOCdUcX8go27Z0tqrb4Br1MADQEiu=q3GgRpPA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 22:04:32 +0500
Khadem Ullah <14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk> wrote:

> Agree, but I think it's also a good practice to guard against known cases
> that are prone to crashes.


Right but DPDK chooses performance over API safety.
For example rx/tx burst doesn't check args.

The point is that as a library, if application is doing something wrong
returning error doesn't always help.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-22 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-22 11:54 Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 13:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-22 14:30   ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 15:42     ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-22 16:01       ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 16:13         ` Bruce Richardson
2025-07-22 17:04           ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 17:38             ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2025-07-22 17:53               ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 18:21                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-22 19:03                   ` Khadem Ullah
2025-07-22 19:05                   ` Ivan Malov
2025-07-22 22:28                     ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250722103824.7c9db0a0@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).