From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037B946C3A; Tue, 29 Jul 2025 07:42:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812AD40668; Tue, 29 Jul 2025 07:42:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f171.google.com (mail-pl1-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC48640668 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2025 07:42:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-23c8f179e1bso58944045ad.1 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 22:42:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uetpeshawar-edu-pk.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1753767767; x=1754372567; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=5PryZlsNiAugyNBpO7ZPlbkUAuslHH4Skk8dLlDpCV4=; b=TEgm1+QdU3CMbcP2vjOdd61udtoK2q1/VUUWLOUomMKk1Q3NbUnFIhJ0CGmZ+eYh49 ztL/ClEGPWZisxILKQFf9UdkAe1CC5loYlb/IO1UXhKEhgwqGeLjSDpWEaWAQ9jtiRjr dnvaZ9F3edqtnNc8wuxIqFAXrK1iNmaFHJjFO0ap1QWAEVADBlXNPwdTYgQKph8I4HjN Z8d+pfOlauVIOTNHxb5I6wADpS9FePsGPccwSnRcWbW7zharZmSlKaGlb6FSciXpOcw+ 1tPhVBVb//M46Pgo7JzxbDU3mzId1XKJ3AdN7HIItW/Nn+9X3tu3m5HgUE6dndVTisPL g7yA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1753767767; x=1754372567; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5PryZlsNiAugyNBpO7ZPlbkUAuslHH4Skk8dLlDpCV4=; b=gSbYaOPRDRCR51M2VpDVupEDnx7KOeRHVSWvAXtj/OfmRe8D1Pihc6L1S6EfGd2Slx GOpl/4JQfi9MqEzVQMIczH7SnY5pQhuMBrGicdr0DRyLQ/lrZyN7HztBQdWkz/uSF5U3 WzSCy+2uDJ7Vf+IixK3eZYKeFawuhkEiBdGIx/Quj2awBl1/4TaRApziO0Go8/vRligs d05X6vXwQ+S+Rp7k/H8JpdS8nih+NUDn3VJhbog9tjaa2SYzg96MTOV/QwgEtrFSejUf ut0Mg/GZkmI5xZjiLYbA6t1Eer9ExlAwnpNkZykDDWynORl9AQC+f3ia9UVR3C/ERnfo 08qA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzalZdQlAFx45DOPddP4hMusBv6yfn3hdpt79qSw0h1YddXNHXB 3tox42DtRVO5/jYxHZWVSoR4saNxzgPmpt8ZlE+h+75KVmDvMtLI04JOYfgoZ4ciV58= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv83+3kktJbX0bhNxh6Hh0u4Ne5NM0r12NghE4eNmFokulUkCXIeXAAjl9Txxp X1OmDQSD387r4UH1+oDlnl+HagDoLjaO+AWW4rmvMF6n6DOUb/LfB501KlaR2oqIdJN0BeApX6D X6E+5xgZGe1l1BqWbuI2Y9ffee/UZ0Obx3KR+pOxFJGzLiluRgKKPlhp/KDMJhFcmb9RE6sFcg1 4RA4oQT3Ktp+InSt+SryhL79WBYyNZZ98RapMH/gr+H2szzxUHd9FvuHFWxakL03j3vw/2DoUaY O3nNfEnweBCX0+HsS1lXBeOXTzicySvCauVUyp7fjBDiGrGuVRheATA/3VXI+vAe7jpu4L95ION wlFoEGfJT4AY+o+PvR9KYuNvMB0WO014U4bZGl6Nqjxn5FFZx747WHiU1fWg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHOjHuETRifnGJm8k+eiqM3xcVka+xSNUD8RGuDUSTsMompGl8cPYNXS0w+QXCB3KNrpKdmEg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ceca:b0:240:2bb6:d4ae with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2402bb6de62mr74010375ad.30.1753767766899; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 22:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([64.62.143.197]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-24071bddcfcsm5456375ad.4.2025.07.28.22.42.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 28 Jul 2025 22:42:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Khadem Ullah <14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk> To: stephen@networkplumber.org, thomas@monjalon.net, ferruh.yigit@amd.com, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH v4] lib/ethdev: fix segfault in secondary process by validating dev_private pointer Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 01:42:29 -0400 Message-ID: <20250729054229.3537412-1-14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20250728144552.361c17e4@hermes.local> References: <20250728144552.361c17e4@hermes.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hi Stephen, Many Thanks for the feedback. I have addressed all the comments on the patch, I have removed the unnecessary check in ethdev, the only one check in rte_ethdev seems to be a neccessary one, as without it, it can still generate segfault while secondary exists after primary. Best regards, Khadem