From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@arknetworks.am>,
Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] mbuf: optimize reset of reinitialized mbufs
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2025 07:28:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250823072829.0176a907@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250823063002.24326-4-mb@smartsharesystems.com>
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 06:30:02 +0000
Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
> An optimized function for resetting a bulk of newly allocated
> reinitialized mbufs (a.k.a. raw mbufs) was added.
>
> Compared to the normal packet mbuf reset function, it takes advantage of
> the following two details:
> 1. The 'next' and 'nb_segs' fields are already reset, so resetting them
> has been omitted.
This doesn't matter, since they are on the same cache line the
operation of touching them costs nothing.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-23 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-21 15:02 [PATCH v5 0/3] mbuf: simplify handling " Morten Brørup
2025-08-21 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] mbuf: de-inline sanity checking a reinitialized mbuf Morten Brørup
2025-08-21 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] promote reinitialized mbuf free and alloc bulk functions as stable Morten Brørup
2025-08-21 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] mbuf: no need to reset all fields on reinitialized mbufs Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] mbuf: simplify handling of " Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] mbuf: de-inline sanity checking a reinitialized mbuf Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 14:26 ` Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] mbuf: promote raw free and alloc bulk functions as stable Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] mbuf: no need to reset all fields on reinitialized mbufs Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] mbuf: simplify handling of " Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] mbuf: de-inline sanity checking a reinitialized mbuf Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] mbuf: promote raw free and alloc bulk functions as stable Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] mbuf: optimize reset of reinitialized mbufs Morten Brørup
2025-08-23 6:29 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] mbuf: simplify handling " Morten Brørup
2025-08-23 6:30 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] mbuf: de-inline sanity checking a reinitialized mbuf Morten Brørup
2025-08-23 6:30 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] mbuf: promote raw free and alloc bulk functions as stable Morten Brørup
2025-08-23 6:30 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] mbuf: optimize reset of reinitialized mbufs Morten Brørup
2025-08-23 14:28 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250823072829.0176a907@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=ivan.malov@arknetworks.am \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).