From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mbuf: optimize segment prefree
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 21:35:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250827213535.21602-1-mb@smartsharesystems.com> (raw)
Eefactored rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg() for both performance and readability.
With the optimized RTE_MBUF_DIRECT() macro, the common likely code path
now fits within one instruction cache line on x86-64 when built with GCC.
Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
---
lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++------------------------
lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h | 8 +++++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
index 06ab7502a5..f4a348597f 100644
--- a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
+++ b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
* http://www.kohala.com/start/tcpipiv2.html
*/
+#include <stdbool.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <rte_common.h>
@@ -1423,44 +1424,31 @@ static inline int __rte_pktmbuf_pinned_extbuf_decref(struct rte_mbuf *m)
static __rte_always_inline struct rte_mbuf *
rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(struct rte_mbuf *m)
{
- __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m, 0);
-
- if (likely(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 1)) {
-
- if (!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m)) {
- rte_pktmbuf_detach(m);
- if (RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m) &&
- RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(m) &&
- __rte_pktmbuf_pinned_extbuf_decref(m))
- return NULL;
- }
-
- if (m->next != NULL)
- m->next = NULL;
- if (m->nb_segs != 1)
- m->nb_segs = 1;
+ bool refcnt_not_one;
- return m;
+ __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m, 0);
- } else if (__rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(m, -1) == 0) {
+ refcnt_not_one = unlikely(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) != 1);
+ if (refcnt_not_one &&
+ __rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(m, -1) != 0)
+ return NULL;
- if (!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m)) {
- rte_pktmbuf_detach(m);
- if (RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m) &&
- RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(m) &&
- __rte_pktmbuf_pinned_extbuf_decref(m))
- return NULL;
- }
+ if (unlikely(!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m))) {
+ rte_pktmbuf_detach(m);
+ if (RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m) &&
+ RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(m) &&
+ __rte_pktmbuf_pinned_extbuf_decref(m))
+ return NULL;
+ }
- if (m->next != NULL)
- m->next = NULL;
- if (m->nb_segs != 1)
- m->nb_segs = 1;
+ if (refcnt_not_one)
rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(m, 1);
+ if (m->nb_segs != 1)
+ m->nb_segs = 1;
+ if (m->next != NULL)
+ m->next = NULL;
- return m;
- }
- return NULL;
+ return m;
}
/**
diff --git a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h
index a0df265b5d..a5242274d7 100644
--- a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h
+++ b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h
@@ -715,6 +715,14 @@ struct rte_mbuf_ext_shared_info {
#define RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(mb) \
(!((mb)->ol_flags & (RTE_MBUF_F_INDIRECT | RTE_MBUF_F_EXTERNAL)))
+/* GCC only optimizes single-bit MSB tests this way, so do it by hand with multi-bit. */
+#if defined(RTE_TOOLCHAIN_GCC) && defined(RTE_ARCH_X86)
+#undef RTE_MBUF_DIRECT
+#define RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(mb) \
+ (!(((const uint8_t *)(mb))[offsetof(struct rte_mbuf, ol_flags) + 7] & \
+ (uint8_t)((RTE_MBUF_F_INDIRECT | RTE_MBUF_F_EXTERNAL) >> 56)))
+#endif
+
/** Uninitialized or unspecified port. */
#define RTE_MBUF_PORT_INVALID UINT16_MAX
/** For backwards compatibility. */
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-08-27 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-27 21:35 Morten Brørup [this message]
2025-08-27 23:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250827213535.21602-1-mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).