From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3544C48946; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:10:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED8B402EE; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:10:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qv1-f47.google.com (mail-qv1-f47.google.com [209.85.219.47]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733D7402EE for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:10:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qv1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-791fd6bffbaso1737296d6.3 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 15:10:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1760566237; x=1761171037; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=qAhGT31H/T56PdiqPDD4KEovO2S/au30oadbW7PGKcg=; b=Os8TJ+behDQ8IGDfRFb+SkQq6U4CT2lO9LlGYxEWkaOgRiqrKkGt2Ha+NMwwSb5nt9 i7IiZTNUMm/oSH3EXCnkmnp0MArm+ivPbhkAobvwZ3hiDi1HNOIYWKgQJJL8aZ4Opmcq 2PIYjnsRt2Lcryzi5t6GERHv64GFHmdQJrGffyrAa097pmWZMwEKfIah+ncAusAFRLvy im+VdWqmB7Rbg7/uwk9CtzBZey3aZozJ2W+wmtWx0plAt5cdNpHaryP7WsPXjzBL5wlz i5+jV99PRwwWFMzqDmHO+wQW/Sowe9e82PSy1ZCdsRKPX3QMuU4woJQyca5O5zSUZFy6 VNFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1760566237; x=1761171037; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qAhGT31H/T56PdiqPDD4KEovO2S/au30oadbW7PGKcg=; b=Ieyr8cM/p+KjqU+UXuXcN+X7scXDHEQnOgDMcN3lDyQ+9Y39LTtrny8pr/iNwaVNjp O+2jobRyU/NOtzudJYi35H7nhlVqC5VNl5XowoDjwqjSIkdRLhRMQ47MleH9HV6j5RXe ZjoEV14lJ/hicsryBexlCj7r6nDvPZccYmj10NYMp+QbMJcAq3NEMZ6cm3aJH4igTrm+ 7ewY6yxT3Yp+R+vgCVGLV1cifkQQbn7t8r0xRDCHM8DUGniqAdhjzMFwQh2D+p36lLrT BYcX4ZWJEzDGuB18jPJB3p9ClWUEEAkUkBdkYU5EX6pGfY0yKxQ1/qZOQGTHEIi/zckw ja7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywj+c8TMh42FUwekPRu7AgxIbLzWd3Ulvi0eOaURAsBo5tYtz2/ iyprATSbMgmHNJlfQLUGQ7VvEePIBNnEaRDouWjWDGCO6ZLB6zC5Ur2xhIiYo+PFSrU= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsO+gQGhqWr/BQQwd+2nHNJ8lVb109qu4zM7W7mijDCBePdoBQdY/o5X/zrVxz z896EGzRChwkhN/0p0hTebVXCPQiyVsT0VX6a7chJUPAXB6ujpeRPBuIWGNUvM/zXkAZDYFseUS cm9sdcNBKma0QCi7Vuya6e8rwU09u2SWJbln39bVJLteKOWoSBJdnOsN9Xkrq9YxZ8bO/pbgAT9 V8k3dSImcJE1gtYKmKyXjV33aXkhKK+BEDu04AAkWomoMPuz8DKRviKInYn7Vdq2103y1up8iR3 9VP/Le2j1vl1llGB14pLryu6vL0rE5hQGGsyFxrHvKerdsok9q+WSY9Z8zeZx+Tzj8IIWwZSlr6 4i+SkXrbxadeDNBt/NUVOxEWmLHCbcV2SfS5GJnqn46m2DfpJ6wqmms1TI9VgkNwQO5IAVl7Fyd HcAxuI1y1C3ruE+6xz7dJUFdQxNMXfCTC28eYfdGDW4lEcpm1xKgkzkFGOV8it7nA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFEUKo7jlfI9ihpq6RmhohlN8DJtM/6kC+7vjII2bBksDcSrgqz/ER6oxHOI49v9W5chSyNQg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:130d:b0:4b7:a2d0:6a25 with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4e6eaceb4a8mr371105611cf.33.1760566236702; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 15:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d75a77b69052e-4e881c577e6sm27732021cf.7.2025.10.15.15.10.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Oct 2025 15:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 14:53:33 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: vanshika.shukla@nxp.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Gagandeep Singh , Sachin Saxena Subject: Re: [v1 08/12] net/enetc: Add VF to PF messaging support and primary MAC setup Message-ID: <20251015145333.4dd5276a@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20251009111633.3585957-9-vanshika.shukla@nxp.com> References: <20251009111633.3585957-1-vanshika.shukla@nxp.com> <20251009111633.3585957-9-vanshika.shukla@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, 9 Oct 2025 16:46:29 +0530 vanshika.shukla@nxp.com wrote: > > +struct enetc_msg_swbd { > + void *vaddr; > + uint64_t dma; > + int size; > +}; > + Do you really want 'size' to be signed value. Wouldn't uint32_t or size_t be better here.