From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D2A489C9; Sat, 25 Oct 2025 00:29:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9BA40151; Sat, 25 Oct 2025 00:29:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pg1-f174.google.com (mail-pg1-f174.google.com [209.85.215.174]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138FA4014F for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2025 00:29:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg1-f174.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-b608df6d2a0so2286020a12.1 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 15:29:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1761344989; x=1761949789; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+BkZZwmGPbCpkcVTwa+c6EULQv5WhhX4vAgt88tJnIk=; b=zH4e75SM9bUMZbmJEgYMJ+9+FheShy8TMp0/LRTelA/dn3pImVY+JViwhilVPRWKxl 6b+Qnfs+yfy7GPOtAg3hDeXO/58vrOemWBQvZXe7ugYei8eQZkfBbphV9qQj1eMPJEe/ zjMwpUw+APSAAPb1HK4m5Z9wV6+ev09Ota5s3PxyHCw7txP0XudjWcGj3ALFHba1Ip6K wd9fr439HHCcwbZkn4YAjkt1mpCmWIOxHe259FMBxJBMZ6+uccVTdVq22PuLibeBAe39 j7n06TKbOnRP0uvdRvMnwwmzXmSG+04BQ9Y0H3hUAZ+pNIXDJeEy3JVzPhMRan780xL5 eQ0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1761344989; x=1761949789; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=+BkZZwmGPbCpkcVTwa+c6EULQv5WhhX4vAgt88tJnIk=; b=hp4qpoKLlimyxTKAo8ByqRSw6ErBVFcsTWIkS4PbQA1Ykkb+KzJB1RLcRxQOpnTTTn c2cjGR4a/Y8xKww67YfIEUT2HMlJVI8ZFmzeBQFFDeI/P5rxOKHlUCvLojBZDwYyQS3g S8KWXx8Tk4BwASMlFwbi4nZrh6/lr7Wy91aPfUKzt1pZMAfRN5KDzm6QdCbXL1XUfsGM eH8+Qz8gDbojB9K0JMMJFXVa5/un12xoLo699+g+6sgw6/TODr84F2SZrgJRNmCpGeLt GNAarr+szO0B3k6/IkVH4pgxn1sm9u0A91Z/Rf1C5zSvTvsTGE7FTcRshDIuX3/okThJ R6bg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxgWbUeHtoXdgnpvMhEv/FY4zvoP82KLTkTmsCiDb9WxgGGEOqz yvSj+ScRi0xEuZ6LQnmNljFLKgy2ktr/V+lNq0hRypJgMbJ+sPcHBUbtPyMI0+44E2q4fdhdsPc GQjQp X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctLeTkhpGJvWidHUMp2CDP3LCrv+YVUrtaytoWb82GN8pANE0QVQjlB3YWrY44 qeUMzWCcDw2mOr6tOVx4agiTpGGIofJXGqyWC5dM5Y8gICd0Yo9JbNFmoF6lqs9zahQlDnVjiYG gCIZZn/yzXOiEfyqIrp5kHqDFDn9GiE2x0rctYFnIQi9uhfmnBM1dUIXR+hEnIJhv8eg/e0WAdn yEvMsGx8pKF8rnf5IhXF6Ir8HNr5Z9CKtFFUtadrgqjzHmsnkeHklY/NzS5fmjomM0w6ayqF6qy S0H3++uUUHK9l+MyKUhKrptslHtoggxW3W6oWncuLHJqnziQZ9RdKpFvg47THzwFrgsLmRtaUkE tq4nSFlfir5CASoeboM+lQHzafLb5Znsbgym1tmokMUbU+ZDTOl35o5qxCuhjhrKRlNd3sBKtL9 m46wPem1OC0h8fGcORfbTsuphdCfS2oS5PUzZeBds= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHnOTAfc/83wnvg8XUO+9rOHv3Zxt5ZNFfqyUC3RiQNa84tDSGKc/DTc0ZAC5iUmnvfMSuBMw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:11c4:b0:28e:7567:3c4b with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2948b97fcbamr45499265ad.16.1761344989100; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 15:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phoenix.lan (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-29498d40de4sm2996445ad.77.2025.10.24.15.29.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 24 Oct 2025 15:29:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Stephen Hemminger To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger , shperetz@nvidia.com, =?UTF-8?q?Morten=20Br=C3=B8rup?= , Thomas Monjalon Subject: [PATCH] mbuf: fix build failure if MBUF_HISTORY_DEBUG enabled Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 15:29:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20251024222946.323662-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Message had extra newline which causes build failure. ../lib/mbuf/mbuf_history.c: In function ‘rte_mbuf_history_init’: ../lib/log/rte_log.h:364:9: error: static assertion failed: "This log format string contains a \\n" 364 | static_assert(!__builtin_strchr(fmt, '\n'), \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../lib/log/rte_log.h:387:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘RTE_LOG_CHECK_NO_NEWLINE’ 387 | RTE_LOG_CHECK_NO_NEWLINE(RTE_FMT_HEAD(__VA_ARGS__ ,)); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../lib/mbuf/mbuf_log.h:8:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘RTE_LOG_LINE’ 8 | RTE_LOG_LINE(level, MBUF, "" __VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ ../lib/mbuf/mbuf_history.c:219:17: note: in expansion of macro ‘MBUF_LOG’ 219 | MBUF_LOG(ERR, "Failed to register mbuf history dynamic field: %s\n", | Fixes: d265a24a32a4 ("mbuf: record mbuf operations history") Cc: shperetz@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger --- lib/mbuf/mbuf_history.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/mbuf/mbuf_history.c b/lib/mbuf/mbuf_history.c index 3bc4b916b6..b025d12fc8 100644 --- a/lib/mbuf/mbuf_history.c +++ b/lib/mbuf/mbuf_history.c @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ void rte_mbuf_history_init(void) rte_mbuf_history_field_offset = rte_mbuf_dynfield_register(&mbuf_dynfield_history); if (rte_mbuf_history_field_offset < 0) { - MBUF_LOG(ERR, "Failed to register mbuf history dynamic field: %s\n", + MBUF_LOG(ERR, "Failed to register mbuf history dynamic field: %s", rte_strerror(rte_errno)); } #endif -- 2.51.0