* [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: make representor parameter more explicit
@ 2025-10-28 9:58 Gregory Etelson
2025-10-28 9:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] net/mlx5: support PF representor suppresion in multi-port E-Switch Gregory Etelson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Etelson @ 2025-10-28 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: getelson, mkashani, rasland, thomas, Andrew Rybchenko
The current format for a port representor parameter is
'-a DBDF,representor=pfXvfY'.
That parameter syntax describes port representor relative to
PCI device DBDF.
In that notation VF Y belongs to PF X and PF X is relative to DBDF.
The syntax 'pfXvfY' will probe 2 port representors: PF X and VF Y.
If we want to refer only to VF Y related to PF X, the parameter must
be '(pfX)vfY'.
In this case only VF Y representor will be probed.
Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
---
doc/guides/prog_guide/ethdev/ethdev.rst | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h | 4 ++++
lib/ethdev/ethdev_private.c | 13 ++++++++++--
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/ethdev/ethdev.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/ethdev/ethdev.rst
index 89eb31a48d..69f84325c7 100644
--- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/ethdev/ethdev.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/ethdev/ethdev.rst
@@ -379,18 +379,35 @@ parameters to those ports.
-a DBDF,representor=vf[0,4,6,9]
-a DBDF,representor=vf[0-31]
-a DBDF,representor=vf[0,2-4,7,9-11]
+
+ These example will attach VF representors relative to DBDF.
+ The VF IDs can be a list, a range or a mix.
+ SF representors follow the same syntax::
+
-a DBDF,representor=sf0
-a DBDF,representor=sf[1,3,5]
-a DBDF,representor=sf[0-1023]
-a DBDF,representor=sf[0,2-4,7,9-11]
+
+ If there are multiple PFs associated with the same PCI device,
+ the PF ID must be used to distinguish between representors relative to different PFs::
+
-a DBDF,representor=pf1vf0
- -a DBDF,representor=pf[0-1]sf[0-127]
- -a DBDF,representor=pf1
+ -a DBDF,representor=pf[0-1]vf0
+
+ The example above will attach 4 representors pf0vf0, pf1vf0, pf0 and pf1.
+ If only VF representors are required, the PF part must be enclosed with parenthesis::
+
+ -a DBDF,representor=(pf[0-1])vf0
+
+ The example above will attach 2 representors pf0vf0, pf1vf0.
+
+ List of representors for the same PCI device is enclosed in square brackets::
+
-a DBDF,representor=[pf[0-1],pf2vf[0-2],pf3[3,5-8]]
- (Multiple representors in one device argument can be represented as a list)
-Note: PMDs are not required to support the standard device arguments and users
-should consult the relevant PMD documentation to see support devargs.
+ Note: PMDs may have additional extensions for the representor parameter, and users
+ should consult the relevant PMD documentation to see support devargs.
Extended Statistics API
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
diff --git a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h
index db0b3d2c40..645e76015a 100644
--- a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h
+++ b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h
@@ -2012,6 +2012,8 @@ __rte_internal
int
rte_eth_switch_domain_free(uint16_t domain_id);
+#define RTE_ETH_DEVARG_IGNORE_PF_REPRESENTOR RTE_BIT32(1)
+
/**
* Generic Ethernet device arguments
*
@@ -2024,6 +2026,8 @@ struct rte_eth_devargs {
/** number of controllers in multi-host controllers field */
uint16_t ports[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
/** port/s number to enable on a multi-port single function */
+ uint32_t port_flags;
+ /** ports flags for special processing */
uint16_t nb_ports;
/** number of ports in ports field */
uint16_t representor_ports[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
diff --git a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_private.c b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_private.c
index a881e9c003..df5fdf25ec 100644
--- a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_private.c
+++ b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_private.c
@@ -152,11 +152,20 @@ rte_eth_devargs_parse_representor_ports(char *str, void *data)
if (str == NULL)
goto done;
}
- if (str[0] == 'p' && str[1] == 'f') {
+ /* pfX... or (pfX)... */
+ if ((str[0] == 'p' && str[1] == 'f') ||
+ (str[0] == '(' && str[1] == 'p' && str[2] == 'f')) {
eth_da->type = RTE_ETH_REPRESENTOR_PF;
- str += 2;
+ if (str[0] == '(')
+ str++; /* advance past leading "(" */
+ str += 2; /* advance past "pf" */
str = rte_eth_devargs_process_list(str, eth_da->ports,
ð_da->nb_ports, RTE_DIM(eth_da->ports));
+ if (str[0] == ')') {
+ str++; /* advance past ")" */
+ eth_da->port_flags =
+ RTE_ETH_DEVARG_IGNORE_PF_REPRESENTOR;
+ }
if (str == NULL || str[0] == '\0')
goto done;
} else if (eth_da->nb_mh_controllers > 0) {
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] net/mlx5: support PF representor suppresion in multi-port E-Switch
2025-10-28 9:58 [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: make representor parameter more explicit Gregory Etelson
@ 2025-10-28 9:58 ` Gregory Etelson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Etelson @ 2025-10-28 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Cc: getelson, mkashani, rasland, thomas, Dariusz Sosnowski,
Viacheslav Ovsiienko, Bing Zhao, Ori Kam, Suanming Mou,
Matan Azrad
In multi-port E-Switch setup, the MLX5 PMD always added
PF representor port.
For example, `representor=pf1vf[0,1]` implicitly added PF1 representor
port:
```
Port Name
0 p0
1 p1
2 representor_c0pf1vf0
3 representor_c0pf1vf1
```
The patch adds support for the new representor format that suppresses
PF representor attachment:
Example: `representor=(pf1)vf[0,1]`
```
Port Name
0 p0
1 representor_c0pf1vf0
2 representor_c0pf1vf1
```
Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c
index 8d11b1ac3a..92084b4cdd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c
@@ -2284,6 +2284,12 @@ mlx5_device_mpesw_pci_match(struct ibv_device *ibv,
return -1;
}
+static inline bool
+mlx5_ingnore_pf_representor(const struct rte_eth_devargs *eth_da)
+{
+ return (eth_da->port_flags & RTE_ETH_DEVARG_IGNORE_PF_REPRESENTOR) != 0;
+}
+
/**
* Register a PCI device within bonding.
*
@@ -2593,8 +2599,12 @@ mlx5_os_pci_probe_pf(struct mlx5_common_device *cdev,
list[ns].info.master = 1;
list[ns].info.representor = 0;
} else {
- list[ns].info.master = 0;
- list[ns].info.representor = 1;
+ if (mlx5_ingnore_pf_representor(req_eth_da)) {
+ continue;
+ } else {
+ list[ns].info.master = 0;
+ list[ns].info.representor = 1;
+ }
}
/*
* Ports of this type have uplink port index
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-28 10:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-28 9:58 [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: make representor parameter more explicit Gregory Etelson
2025-10-28 9:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] net/mlx5: support PF representor suppresion in multi-port E-Switch Gregory Etelson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).