From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5022548A11; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:35:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A254026F; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:35:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-oa1-f44.google.com (mail-oa1-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B177240150 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:35:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oa1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-3d199f29161so965340fac.0 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:35:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1761838531; x=1762443331; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=duFLzUJcnaSVqe/ng0+l31kduX+gXG+OP1P66LE9ZPk=; b=yUa+CGcKhWHOw4xokH7/GsHCeIUOleSLE5pCQ7TCs2XgfLBQ+kkzuHpQiWVeWe84Bk P8KphZ7XhO8/w8VCTgCiUOlhapTvLs0DWoRtvT7EnhMRVYVlRdQTfHCKRrAGeicqbn8I dEKK33w9qkgEJpCGGUId2uMRmhigr8FO2cevQ//AQYmoIxVu+opum8ayh0qiKqNrsqHY QAR0Twp0yyyXfUQyb6DmI3NOnvlgIuFY6vKm7kLa7v/4LE+ATPo/VvG66G2AhjVn+30Y Yfs11kFjH1Psmpdh5KDgkjCkU7quh7G84dSK5TEpgGMYE2wYXr/Ub8XoF/jIA6+olWgQ w/6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1761838531; x=1762443331; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=duFLzUJcnaSVqe/ng0+l31kduX+gXG+OP1P66LE9ZPk=; b=GJaiWIgyXplUdxHKD2fCpzliJEEGivf81ib8FmdOMZNC2jiAyCiYNk+lgE9pWVyHhD jaZ1OYZjS4zwpWLciXwvP54JBQdLgNcfDZIhNcY+QrbUYJdi0JaLAUTRmx4vL4i7Tutw NsnuofnSUVciMGY1NdOYj9kzRfPGkv3atDe2Qlj2Sltudh80Mn0zLexuHI/E/SFzLiNA rxniEA+HRrwvmNP+9eNUYacqngsTbeVbA8ieY/Aq94peWA7XwCAGznX9qrPFzNdcNMhG FVOS7TwOzBuGQhuZi4b5Iq8TVHVYRS5ZnIfM60WyYhtjqQLOVlv+IvfHXgyrgFRP5ROL 7QbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy5AJlrMm8H+/tViAexfiCa62dESiz5Vrx9sjPPMooeGPY6MaY3 uo4rSbWIzHwDYDDVzbUinbfhl7eH+XX+kkPdeMLdpoEDZNUuMgrJwmWGD7j7W45bIHm9PMXGeWY a9G3y X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncve/2Tryyxcy1cPKe79bZHXKveoRCpdjXHG9gq/yGbPBRSLJ/PEaKa4jx2Hx5d 000YC+FARNN8XNeEJbwkVnTu3nBbAcEsvqBAA1Pj95HRSyOf5Ky0zs8iO8apWY4fspNTiFnvh+R Ovwbg/RoPcLGsa9GKAaGmV5xdP3Btl7nEcKVNNya3oX8RoTgfjGl4ViNSIDQM0YUYBEK1nKnI+w nLG3fkDHY3L9FFlUywyvuoRi2i6iJ5d6kf9ewjlNhE72/m1ySJMN9Wk/cqDiEJnAZAJ7Xqq/A9s WfW7nV13nCuIHfmHvW/ot1nnFSzXRaJ93pjWguLdY+YehGO8CVU1qI2+470WbXO84EtCqoAgl6h xRKEmxtH1BeJlSqy2w37YUXwUdbv9q5QQ2EduzbJgEs92KiA/7ziuAkr77RCmyQoDmhuGTbFGSB lTdL8lR8xTpIJdEBtaqidjiengp+P3uffHWsL5zc0EkCtl X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHqq+xd3wr9FsHvs1ysJKcgIaCYMMcw2dAoB1U9I81KWwr+c4sHZ4BkUR+vkYd4cCe1Wv26+A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:a352:b0:342:6d27:2e2 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-3d8c902d667mr1641451fac.29.1761838530632; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phoenix (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 586e51a60fabf-3d1e35443dcsm5915057fac.19.2025.10.30.08.35.30 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:35:27 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: retest Message-ID: <20251030083527.49d149d6@phoenix> In-Reply-To: <20251024025647.1563088-1-chen.qiguo@zte.com.cn> References: <20251021065607.1418203-2-chen.qiguo@zte.com.cn> <20251024025647.1563088-1-chen.qiguo@zte.com.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 10:56:47 +0800 Qiguo Chen wrote: > Currently, various testing labs perform CI testing on new patch series se= nt > to dev at dpdk.org and report their results to > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/. On each series on the patch > list, the results appear in the test category contexts for IOL (community > lab), GitHub, and LoongSon. >=20 > If a reported failure on a series seems suspicious to the patch submitter > or maintainer, then there may be an interest in requesting a retest on the > series for the failing label(s) in order to verify the failure is not > spurious or a false positive. This retest demonstrates to the submitter or > maintainer that the failure can be reliably reproduced. Unfortunately, at > present, the best way to accomplish this is to reach out to lab maintaine= rs > via email or Slack. This is not ideal for developers in need of quick test > results. >=20 > Going forward, CI testing labs will be implementing the option to request > retest for their respective test labels on patchwork via emails sent to t= he > dev mailing list. This feature is ready today for labels reported by the > UNH-IOL Community Lab, and will soon also be an option for the Github Rob= ot > at least. >=20 > In order to request a retest on your patch series, send an email reply to > one of your series=E2=80=99s patch or cover letter emails with email cont= ent of the > format used below: >=20 > Recheck-request: