From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2614248A86; Thu, 6 Nov 2025 20:29:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6537A4060A; Thu, 6 Nov 2025 20:29:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pf1-f174.google.com (mail-pf1-f174.google.com [209.85.210.174]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFF8402EA for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2025 20:29:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pf1-f174.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7a435a3fc57so6912b3a.1 for ; Thu, 06 Nov 2025 11:29:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1762457354; x=1763062154; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=yUQpi2TzICmJClUbAIAmRqiGG3j2/JCGhWt8iXJLe8c=; b=LOYEIMc3APd/JBtVzw8Q6hT0OEy/F19MgjYxrqeaO18Uuw8OXUNavtT47i3bnDE/rK pRo20IXqnCESaxooiU9sD7LsBAC7314j5QuFBfyeXmK0tHoARQiS+11bynQy+bl9X7Zd efNsZJ0KMn5RCAjQmn354VmemQUCIO99E2mFPotoGMarrUQKEfYds+r2ElKDfWkfwh4v 6YBL2QNKf8iGzg0Fbnvz444Gtl3bl/VqSm+wsiK9KohvnyrUFdYqvVEOu0rHOXgzJsv1 xK7H/tkoyjfZQs77nhUC4nok0TXsgg3YZjjcUYITYMPHEIm9ycSmW6EWHx02XXmTQ3kJ AeVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1762457354; x=1763062154; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yUQpi2TzICmJClUbAIAmRqiGG3j2/JCGhWt8iXJLe8c=; b=GHbKZNZ977mmRkf+HnreMWDlqkf4q7gISrF4wSFujF5bygP8bhOXp3+/b4HCW3PwBE 4v7J7aQNK5JFKOmSHQTfm1A9DpXwx6KOKfoccWxt/x3lCQQFnz6BCtJXyw9a+6bDW2rs 1o+A900BIcIfvyh534tXx4HhxpHs+OyAQAvIlGYhOzG8t7T4tjGx3yLf57++cYAykV11 +FNhEz6ptEboIvouEgh05azG7/vm/aVlPSUU6SlAYuSsKdehrmOTGProXoP2Ieu+0WvP zMSKJSqI22vPpo1URcbvsoa+vD1520GKctUggTRj9KIdnvo1wSP3E6V2mS8INBkmljeg 3DPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YykhvWguZrxG2T8eEOYsAFdJdzQTBwXnk8bvtyL/r88HPFklVH+ +TRmy40L47ZUTdWNP1tmhLyUzbIYES1K5NYNoIEVYt6/2K4nkmvD18rS4kMKFRmZTBM= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsiqiLXsf9q5DsRxnzwWOMs8UcIA/qM5MJOtnfS8cqVq2iSgSVJomX30AP+4UU UDRLGEIJltupl4aslaXsuJkxCtMGdpOCpY0lDl9cTOy8qiA5mc/z1KQq8G1kL/o4kA0SvGbM5HJ 6S/LFnqCoQQHQOOTMrhcL3gJ3PKG0pyEdAANxR7RessLByP9TrnGr3RlYh3uSf5QWfoNOvI29Ay NFsqIauqEsEqcSrmL0fsbySETAyDL3utWH1yVB6+q159mfp7s05bppvmAnKRwRYqnu1kUC6cYst Ecb7Cdl0u/0d9ItvH+vZJcaOFCLhq93GPzIATujpZbmXFXnEiVX7waooNezE5bWd55pL6jtLkNZ 22/62ipuQ5S43KGpB4MqbfyOixYPixlWm2pFJ5ZYdRdJ6Htv1FFuFI5KUaGlEMnYFkLdR8P/IWg ycNqqN2BDVTJPyddnBmwWtPPzWn9nZ1sirAA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHKK+5NGuKlY59Cu6n7ygipU3Cs/Yxv/bzDwTlm8ZtIGf+YE6e7Z4LBrH2Xob7SjCkJlMlAJw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:b44:b0:792:f084:404f with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7b0b8cc352amr934587b3a.0.1762457353877; Thu, 06 Nov 2025 11:29:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from phoenix (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-7b0c9f01821sm340660b3a.26.2025.11.06.11.29.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Nov 2025 11:29:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 11:29:11 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Hemant Agrawal Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Maxime Leroy , jun.yang@nxp.com, stable@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net/dpaa2: clear active VDQ state when freeing Rx queues Message-ID: <20251106112911.0c50107b@phoenix> In-Reply-To: <20251106163807.201451-2-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> References: <20251106163807.201451-1-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <20251106163807.201451-2-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 22:08:06 +0530 Hemant Agrawal wrote: > +static void > +dpaa2_clear_queue_active_dps(struct dpaa2_queue *q, int num_lcores) > +{ > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < num_lcores; i++) { > + struct queue_storage_info_t *qs = q->q_storage[i]; > + > + if (!qs) > + continue; > + > + if (qs->active_dqs) { > + clear_swp_active_dqs(qs->active_dpio_id); > + qs->active_dqs = NULL; > + } > + } > +} > + Why not use RTE_LCORE_FOREACH() here?