From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>,
Fan Zhang <fanzhang.oss@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 28/33] app/test-security-perf: fix build with shadow warnings
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 15:50:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251107155034.436809-29-bruce.richardson@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251107155034.436809-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Rename variables to eliminate variable shadowing.
NOTE: The test-security-perf app reuses code from "dpdk-test" app, so
some changes are made there too.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
app/test-security-perf/test_security_perf.c | 42 ++++++++++-----------
app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.c | 13 +++----
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test-security-perf/test_security_perf.c b/app/test-security-perf/test_security_perf.c
index b0d55cbab0..dd377a6027 100644
--- a/app/test-security-perf/test_security_perf.c
+++ b/app/test-security-perf/test_security_perf.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ struct test_ctx {
bool is_inbound;
};
-static struct test_ctx ctx;
+static struct test_ctx test_ctx;
static int
cryptodev_init(struct test_ctx *ctx, uint8_t nb_lcores)
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ test_security_session_perf(void *arg)
nb_sessions += (nb_sess_total - nb_sessions * nb_lcores);
ret = sec_conf_init(conf, &sess_conf, &ipsec_xform,
- &ctx.td[ctx.td_idx]);
+ &test_ctx.td[test_ctx.td_idx]);
if (ret) {
RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Could not initialize session conf\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
@@ -447,14 +447,14 @@ args_parse(int argc, char **argv)
if (strcmp(lgopts[opt_idx].name, "nb-sess") == 0) {
n = atoi(optarg);
if (n >= 0)
- ctx.nb_sess = n;
+ test_ctx.nb_sess = n;
else
rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
"nb-sess should be >= 0\n");
- printf("nb-sess %d / ", ctx.nb_sess);
+ printf("nb-sess %d / ", test_ctx.nb_sess);
} else if (strcmp(lgopts[opt_idx].name, "inbound") ==
0) {
- ctx.is_inbound = true;
+ test_ctx.is_inbound = true;
printf("inbound / ");
}
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
unsigned long i;
int ret;
- memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(struct test_ctx));
+ memset(&test_ctx, 0, sizeof(struct test_ctx));
memset(&flags, 0, sizeof(flags));
ret = rte_eal_init(argc, argv);
@@ -498,18 +498,18 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
return -EINVAL;
}
- ctx.nb_sess = DEF_NB_SESSIONS + RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE * nb_lcores;
+ test_ctx.nb_sess = DEF_NB_SESSIONS + RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE * nb_lcores;
if (argc > 1)
args_parse(argc, argv);
- ctx.nb_lcores = nb_lcores;
+ test_ctx.nb_lcores = nb_lcores;
- ret = cryptodev_init(&ctx, nb_lcores);
+ ret = cryptodev_init(&test_ctx, nb_lcores);
if (ret)
goto exit;
- ret = mempool_init(&ctx, nb_lcores);
+ ret = mempool_init(&test_ctx, nb_lcores);
if (ret)
goto cryptodev_fini;
@@ -521,19 +521,19 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
&flags,
&td_outb[i],
1);
- if (ctx.is_inbound)
+ if (test_ctx.is_inbound)
test_ipsec_td_in_from_out(&td_outb[i], &td_inb[i]);
}
- ctx.td = td_outb;
- if (ctx.is_inbound)
- ctx.td = td_inb;
+ test_ctx.td = td_outb;
+ if (test_ctx.is_inbound)
+ test_ctx.td = td_inb;
- for (ctx.td_idx = 0; ctx.td_idx < RTE_DIM(sec_alg_list); ctx.td_idx++) {
+ for (test_ctx.td_idx = 0; test_ctx.td_idx < RTE_DIM(sec_alg_list); test_ctx.td_idx++) {
printf("\n\n Algorithm combination:");
- test_sec_alg_display(sec_alg_list[ctx.td_idx].param1,
- sec_alg_list[ctx.td_idx].param2);
+ test_sec_alg_display(sec_alg_list[test_ctx.td_idx].param1,
+ sec_alg_list[test_ctx.td_idx].param2);
printf(" ----------------------");
printf("\n%20s%20s%20s%20s%20s%20s\n\n",
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
i = 0;
RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_WORKER(lcore_id) {
rte_eal_remote_launch(test_security_session_perf,
- &ctx.lconf[i],
+ &test_ctx.lconf[i],
lcore_id);
i++;
}
@@ -556,12 +556,12 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
}
- cryptodev_fini(&ctx);
- mempool_fini(&ctx);
+ cryptodev_fini(&test_ctx);
+ mempool_fini(&test_ctx);
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
cryptodev_fini:
- cryptodev_fini(&ctx);
+ cryptodev_fini(&test_ctx);
exit:
return EXIT_FAILURE;
diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.c
index 2576afbd99..bc1b392da7 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.c
+++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_security_ipsec.c
@@ -264,11 +264,10 @@ test_ipsec_td_prepare(const struct crypto_param *param1,
{
struct ipsec_test_data *td;
- int i;
memset(td_array, 0, nb_td * sizeof(*td));
- for (i = 0; i < nb_td; i++) {
+ for (int i = 0; i < nb_td; i++) {
td = &td_array[i];
/* Prepare fields based on param */
@@ -339,7 +338,6 @@ test_ipsec_td_prepare(const struct crypto_param *param1,
struct rte_tcp_hdr *tcp;
int64_t payload_len;
uint8_t *data;
- int64_t i;
payload_len = RTE_MIN(flags->plaintext_len, IPSEC_TEXT_MAX_LEN);
payload_len -= sizeof(struct rte_ipv6_hdr);
@@ -355,8 +353,8 @@ test_ipsec_td_prepare(const struct crypto_param *param1,
/* TCP */
tcp = (struct rte_tcp_hdr *)(ip6 + 1);
data = (uint8_t *)(tcp + 1);
- for (i = 0; i < payload_len; i++)
- data[i] = i;
+ for (int64_t j = 0; j < payload_len; j++)
+ data[j] = j;
tcp->cksum = 0;
tcp->cksum = rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum(ip6, tcp);
td->input_text.len = payload_len + sizeof(struct rte_ipv6_hdr) +
@@ -366,7 +364,6 @@ test_ipsec_td_prepare(const struct crypto_param *param1,
struct rte_tcp_hdr *tcp;
int64_t payload_len;
uint8_t *data;
- int64_t i;
payload_len = RTE_MIN(flags->plaintext_len, IPSEC_TEXT_MAX_LEN);
payload_len -= sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
@@ -384,8 +381,8 @@ test_ipsec_td_prepare(const struct crypto_param *param1,
/* TCP */
tcp = (struct rte_tcp_hdr *)(ip + 1);
data = (uint8_t *)(tcp + 1);
- for (i = 0; i < payload_len; i++)
- data[i] = i;
+ for (int64_t j = 0; j < payload_len; j++)
+ data[j] = j;
tcp->cksum = 0;
tcp->cksum = rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(ip, tcp);
td->input_text.len = payload_len + sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr) +
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-07 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-06 14:09 [RFC PATCH 00/19] Fix building much of DPDK with -Wshadow Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 01/19] eal: fix variable shadowing Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 02/19] ethdev: fix variable shadowing issues Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 03/19] eventdev: " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 04/19] net: remove shadowed variable Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 05/19] graph: fix variable shadowing errors Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 15:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-06 16:33 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 06/19] pipeline: fix variable shadowing Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 07/19] table: fix issues with " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 19:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-06 19:58 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 08/19] power: rename variable to eliminate shadowing Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 09/19] pcapng: rename variable to fix shadowing Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 15:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 10/19] telemetry: make socket handler typedef private Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 2:43 ` fengchengwen
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 11/19] bbdev: fix variable shadowing Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 12/19] bus/pci: remove shadowed variables Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 13/19] net/intel: rename function param to avoid shadow warnings Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 14/19] net/e1000: fix build with shadow warnings enabled Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 15/19] net/i40e: " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 16/19] net/ice: " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 17/19] net/cpfl: " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 18/19] net/ixgbe: " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-06 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 19/19] app/test-pmd: " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:49 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/33] build DPDK with -Wshadow Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:49 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/33] eal: add more min/max helpers Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:49 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/33] eal: fix variable shadowing Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:49 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/33] ethdev: fix variable shadowing issues Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/33] eventdev: " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/33] net: remove shadowed variable Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/33] pipeline: fix variable shadowing Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/33] table: fix issues with " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/33] power: rename variable to eliminate shadowing Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/33] pcapng: rename variable to fix shadowing Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/33] telemetry: make socket handler typedef private Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/33] bbdev: fix variable shadowing Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/33] bus/pci: remove shadowed variables Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/33] net/intel: rename function param to avoid shadow warnings Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/33] net/e1000: fix build with shadow warnings enabled Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/33] net/i40e: " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/33] net/ice: " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/33] net/cpfl: " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/33] net/ixgbe: " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/33] app/test-pmd: " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/33] app/graph: " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/33] app/pdump: fix warning about shadowed variable Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/33] app/test-bbdev: use RTE_MAX3 to remove variable shadowing Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/33] app/test-compress-perf: fix " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/33] app/test-crypto-perf: fix shadowed variable Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/33] app/test-dma-perf: renamed " Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/33] app/test-eventdev: fix build with shadow warnings enabled Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/33] app/test-flow-perf: remove unneeded variable Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/33] app/test-pipeline: remove unnecessary variable Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/33] drivers: disable variable shadowing warnings for drivers Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/33] app/test: disable shadowing warnings for unit tests Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/33] examples: ignore variable shadowing warnings Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 33/33] build: enable shadowed variable warnings Bruce Richardson
2025-11-07 16:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/33] build DPDK with -Wshadow Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-07 16:13 ` Bruce Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251107155034.436809-29-bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fanzhang.oss@gmail.com \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).