From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: scott.k.mitch1@gmail.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, mb@smartsharesystems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] net: optimize raw checksum computation
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 21:36:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260108213651.36b7b492@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260108214713.52987-1-scott.k.mitch1@gmail.com>
On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 16:47:13 -0500
scott.k.mitch1@gmail.com wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/net/rte_ip4.h b/lib/net/rte_ip4.h
> index 822a660cfb..63852717c9 100644
> --- a/lib/net/rte_ip4.h
> +++ b/lib/net/rte_ip4.h
> @@ -223,21 +223,17 @@ rte_ipv4_phdr_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr, uint64_t ol_flags)
> uint8_t zero; /* zero. */
> uint8_t proto; /* L4 protocol type. */
> uint16_t len; /* L4 length. */
> - } psd_hdr;
> -
> - uint32_t l3_len;
> -
> - psd_hdr.src_addr = ipv4_hdr->src_addr;
> - psd_hdr.dst_addr = ipv4_hdr->dst_addr;
> - psd_hdr.zero = 0;
> - psd_hdr.proto = ipv4_hdr->next_proto_id;
> - if (ol_flags & (RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_SEG | RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_SEG)) {
> - psd_hdr.len = 0;
> - } else {
> - l3_len = rte_be_to_cpu_16(ipv4_hdr->total_length);
> - psd_hdr.len = rte_cpu_to_be_16((uint16_t)(l3_len -
> - rte_ipv4_hdr_len(ipv4_hdr)));
> - }
> + } psd_hdr = {
> + .src_addr = ipv4_hdr->src_addr,
> + .dst_addr = ipv4_hdr->dst_addr,
> + .proto = ipv4_hdr->next_proto_id,
> + .len = (ol_flags & (RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_SEG | RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_SEG))
> + ? (uint16_t)0
> + : rte_cpu_to_be_16((uint16_t)(rte_be_to_cpu_16(ipv4_hdr->total_length) -
> + rte_ipv4_hdr_len(ipv4_hdr)))
> + };
> + RTE_SUPPRESS_UNINITIALIZED_WARNING(psd_hdr);
> +
> return rte_raw_cksum(&psd_hdr, sizeof(psd_hdr));
> }
>
I also observed while looking at rte_ipv4.h that the structure elements
in the psd_hdr are not correct type. Src,dst should be rte_be32_t and len should be rte_be16_t
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-09 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-08 21:47 scott.k.mitch1
2026-01-09 5:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-09 5:36 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-01-09 5:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-09 17:50 ` Scott Mitchell
2026-01-10 3:46 ` Scott Mitchell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260108213651.36b7b492@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=scott.k.mitch1@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).