From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D3DA0C41; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:47:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F36840141; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:47:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B47140040 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:47:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C014F5C0175; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:47:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:47:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= 6tPoVWloacaXOBQS60adKBv7vqnOkK3d91pkCAQddfA=; b=L9l2CJuhBqw/FgaY wnXNYF/MWTyHvBEqtDoMi7+VTW1jQU/LYdVvIyb+2//zj1YuRRxqYgrlQw2bfYEM gZU0tjYOdwL7hgzAI9btacR/ledeRrCTm8cbeEk9HwjwgznuXAjky1BXZDJ85GU1 JqrISPplRZE2J26C873qfa3NaFAY9gWYnH55jw2GZDHcla6QfJoikeXzTCDkHUza kRuRtJkfJOo6X94J9KAOSl9/jNZNUsQj0t7Vg4kdI6fIzko3Qlo+1gfKtgX83bne +bFP13IZY9lCPRcX8IXsiBbjq5nWO1jlpGsHvcKoM3lxIgLb4KR2FZ6SygWMT8r2 TZC9dA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=6tPoVWloacaXOBQS60adKBv7vqnOkK3d91pkCAQdd fA=; b=LOSJpyQA3rFm6wG3fGZMcWjAO6ZPSHGruRYtfo1E92ccGb8kFg9XwtRZV kF2SJjqJ9pr89UXIBHGkfNnaB0V5Ou9CXSYkj5a2NfkD0lP+8f10/yX77P3rtAAG cnYlBQna2hoFXl2KQifoF/4xQTK+ZAgmgBWTiYFjqYPrZsx8NhDqb7rswi3fb8i3 59M0bXWg0L7M5bPpDvKFGAP0nYxNRj7lZJNTfZtBtIXMp5qhyiGVIP3khz+sniCt w8opTIwyBwsuJUkgxXRsJckK7fwaDNYMbNHlO+wX65eRy5G5FZVAISwo/aoskzyp hCXE+4boUVXO1QnL1lvWJU4+xhGuQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrfedvgdduheduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:47:55 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand Cc: dev , Bruce Richardson , Luca Boccassi , Timothy Redaelli , Ilya Maximets , Jim Harris , mohammed@hawari.fr, Aaron Conole , Michael Santana Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ci: test build with minimum configuration Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:47:53 +0100 Message-ID: <2035666.G95Ma7kUgn@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20211110164814.5231-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <41978474.LeJqzCrlB4@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 16/11/2021 21:39, David Marchand: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 6:06 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > 10/11/2021 17:48, David Marchand: > > > Disabling optional libraries was not tested. > > > Add a new target in test-meson-builds.sh and GHA. > > > > > > The Bluefield target is removed from test-meson-builds.sh to save space > > > and compilation time in exchange of the new target. > > > > OK to remove build-arm64-bluefield. > > We should also remove build-arm64-host-clang which has no benefit. > > To be fair, I originally had no such change and added this following > an offline discussion you and I had :-). > But this is going farther than what this patch is about: testing > disabling components through existing options. > > > > And instead of adding a new target, can we reuse an existing one, > > like build-clang-static or build-arm64-dpaa? > > Reusing means we lose some coverage of the existing target. > I prefer adding a dedicated target. > > So I think I'll go back to my original idea and drop the bluefield change. > To make this new target less space/cpu consuming (which impacts us, > maintainers, when merging patches), I can make it a really > minimalistic configuration: I would disable all drivers (but the > net/null one used in test-null.sh). > > > I don't mind looking into other target usefulness in > test-meson-builds.sh, but as a followup series. I fully agree with this plan.