From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com
 [209.85.212.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBEA569A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  9 Jul 2015 03:18:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wiwl6 with SMTP id l6so4247323wiw.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 18:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=pf8yd7MWOzXH/ybqbQdeFtiZ+rhM63lFIvgRobGOe7M=;
 b=G/h3gdglpLRBM7f7Fgl55HKnQa92uRS+pqgZXPQAghRmgyghccE6U25GSc2RoWZqfC
 m9D58PXHKK9FcShauq96P/qeXJ77WPakY4mxuI89jaMjTFhzKCozjjXmXi/gLPj+vjR5
 +1jzezL1YltHyX1dXEERW1KD4jQVQwalbw4SFdXF6XibgCaz7tDhkX7IEHXYOLrCARdw
 FrX2UDbcXAQTU3pnXhRLs3uVN6vHXh4o/dBh9eJN1zEQBEyrDRBbPNqg3Y86O1nrzwzP
 J8y9kGpgHuwZwHs80gmXo1ol/TKZYKNSu0FqRVW6rfmEXud56YDtXIQF5yd/Pe1WJED9
 XmXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm1ELYtUxzVV7T8ZmsMZEQupAwX/hyMWWxgfu68S7JJbB30fpk0pphXndrv9XU3TgQ58zhA
X-Received: by 10.180.10.163 with SMTP id j3mr43654500wib.34.1436404698030;
 Wed, 08 Jul 2015 18:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c2sm6065479wjf.18.2015.07.08.18.18.16
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 08 Jul 2015 18:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: damu <2103458176@qq.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 03:17:12 +0200
Message-ID: <2055925.78Hac3pZee@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20150708152807.GA10344@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <tencent_5202582B1438E36B0409FB28@qq.com>
 <20150708152807.GA10344@bricha3-MOBL3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [PATCH v2] librte_hash: miss parentheses in
	hash function
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 01:18:18 -0000

2015-07-08 16:28, Bruce Richardson:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 11:15:47PM +0800, damu wrote:
> > In the no-x86 branch, a parentheses is missing.
> > And need to include <limits.h> header to use CHAR_BIT.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Liu <2103458176@qq.com>
> 
> Previously also reported here: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/6105/
> Fixes line can be extracted for there, as can my ack, since it's an idential fix. :-)

Applied, thanks