From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net> Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3717CDA for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:05:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60EF22187; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:05:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:05:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=VpP7bYqOTLFLqC2IobCY3WjTczWvxyWLGSYgCavtqIk=; b=r81UJT0X5XS9 JBAC2J3Rz5jEehB5IusM7rDSeM15SlhFpY/i1SRNn4wtgnnvUsmEMeDYYxW9ws00 GEe2Xue+fGVuozO0GepWGNcW3AJdqwz5q5SY96LcORMuL0ZiJlgQVB2iK3ltWWcS w+gitXdUt7QkPut/8gyrgHk4D5HcfOA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=VpP7bYqOTLFLqC2IobCY3WjTczWvxyWLGSYgCavtq Ik=; b=2NM96UZi/SsCTU8IzNXT0Vwpb5dOCU45x4JSE9KkYo1wMY6SQmI37NKZf 42H8x1dk5/UqJAUdMCkUvspmW7Reezqh0w6XaUGQ/EWc57QW6Gotun/qc3mFItX2 smlg8A17XefddvdWO7Ouyk9gb4PksWDGY0/cklx4ThWQbplmTaI1YbZjyfjjbvWT y/72d3M2e9jk9/2lcrWKh6LdaueQcuJOZc2wgfeTL0dwFsb4QDmJomBHCttrSIJq 3F9taA3bStbevJ9dodi6rpEIDsP31ZnXcwF+YwpQEityDNvoubY3u7CYKVATGFoY 4Z2LMOWt7m8CX2iiOxCKgyOA2rM7w== X-ME-Sender: <xms:oEiSXMMBSimCw-ZWqm_A5mThV-KbSyW_zbT1i1VY8QNkSj58CBEOHg> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrieeigdeitdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:oEiSXJs6ERsHqf3cumoaSe2NEcy4amVSUbus2P1I6mkXzEfzgVQQpg> <xmx:oEiSXMFCQfKOHwUrwLlZetb8TyhUAHU7rUGRpeJ2--TTaCMBQtc55g> <xmx:oEiSXJb_LxOp0TcGtRRDLtB5cChLixMPS-GacbI7U57m3LH_jcuvIg> <xmx:oEiSXKXWE9gX_m3Cf0g1nru8BGTo7VWpTxuKz_OdrkyX8EnC94GSZw> Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 61F2BE4886; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:05:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Cc: Rami Rosen <ramirose@gmail.com>, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:05:17 +0100 Message-ID: <2057184.VXND6Oo4BK@xps> In-Reply-To: <9dfea583-50f8-fbbc-c83e-0ae4419dce68@intel.com> References: <20190313100910.31260-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <21004029.OMB2mdimH3@xps> <9dfea583-50f8-fbbc-c83e-0ae4419dce68@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] examples/ethtool: remove query of default config X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 14:05:21 -0000 20/03/2019 14:56, Ferruh Yigit: > On 3/20/2019 1:51 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 20/03/2019 14:46, Ferruh Yigit: > >> Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks. > >> > >> (only this patch merged, not series. Other patch seems waiting for comment.) > > > > Applying half of patchset makes tracking of patches less obvious. > > I prefer we avoid such practice. > > Generally I agree, this case the patches in patchset looks can be independent > and merged one was trivial, I tend to this for similar cases. Even if it is independent (it is not really in this case), it looks weird to see half of patchset pending in patchwork. We may spend some time to understand what happened. > Do you prefer me drop the applied patch? You can keep it now it's applied. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18282A00E6 for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:05:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5040E1B0F7; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:05:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3717CDA for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:05:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60EF22187; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:05:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:05:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=VpP7bYqOTLFLqC2IobCY3WjTczWvxyWLGSYgCavtqIk=; b=r81UJT0X5XS9 JBAC2J3Rz5jEehB5IusM7rDSeM15SlhFpY/i1SRNn4wtgnnvUsmEMeDYYxW9ws00 GEe2Xue+fGVuozO0GepWGNcW3AJdqwz5q5SY96LcORMuL0ZiJlgQVB2iK3ltWWcS w+gitXdUt7QkPut/8gyrgHk4D5HcfOA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=VpP7bYqOTLFLqC2IobCY3WjTczWvxyWLGSYgCavtq Ik=; b=2NM96UZi/SsCTU8IzNXT0Vwpb5dOCU45x4JSE9KkYo1wMY6SQmI37NKZf 42H8x1dk5/UqJAUdMCkUvspmW7Reezqh0w6XaUGQ/EWc57QW6Gotun/qc3mFItX2 smlg8A17XefddvdWO7Ouyk9gb4PksWDGY0/cklx4ThWQbplmTaI1YbZjyfjjbvWT y/72d3M2e9jk9/2lcrWKh6LdaueQcuJOZc2wgfeTL0dwFsb4QDmJomBHCttrSIJq 3F9taA3bStbevJ9dodi6rpEIDsP31ZnXcwF+YwpQEityDNvoubY3u7CYKVATGFoY 4Z2LMOWt7m8CX2iiOxCKgyOA2rM7w== X-ME-Sender: <xms:oEiSXMMBSimCw-ZWqm_A5mThV-KbSyW_zbT1i1VY8QNkSj58CBEOHg> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrieeigdeitdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:oEiSXJs6ERsHqf3cumoaSe2NEcy4amVSUbus2P1I6mkXzEfzgVQQpg> <xmx:oEiSXMFCQfKOHwUrwLlZetb8TyhUAHU7rUGRpeJ2--TTaCMBQtc55g> <xmx:oEiSXJb_LxOp0TcGtRRDLtB5cChLixMPS-GacbI7U57m3LH_jcuvIg> <xmx:oEiSXKXWE9gX_m3Cf0g1nru8BGTo7VWpTxuKz_OdrkyX8EnC94GSZw> Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 61F2BE4886; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:05:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Cc: Rami Rosen <ramirose@gmail.com>, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:05:17 +0100 Message-ID: <2057184.VXND6Oo4BK@xps> In-Reply-To: <9dfea583-50f8-fbbc-c83e-0ae4419dce68@intel.com> References: <20190313100910.31260-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <21004029.OMB2mdimH3@xps> <9dfea583-50f8-fbbc-c83e-0ae4419dce68@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] examples/ethtool: remove query of default config X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Message-ID: <20190320140517.XpYWLhjOkO4vmF4z0gl2hcv8WlAIl5D7w3Gs-K5EQMw@z> 20/03/2019 14:56, Ferruh Yigit: > On 3/20/2019 1:51 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 20/03/2019 14:46, Ferruh Yigit: > >> Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks. > >> > >> (only this patch merged, not series. Other patch seems waiting for comment.) > > > > Applying half of patchset makes tracking of patches less obvious. > > I prefer we avoid such practice. > > Generally I agree, this case the patches in patchset looks can be independent > and merged one was trivial, I tend to this for similar cases. Even if it is independent (it is not really in this case), it looks weird to see half of patchset pending in patchwork. We may spend some time to understand what happened. > Do you prefer me drop the applied patch? You can keep it now it's applied.