* [PATCH 0/4] clean code for dmadev and hns3
@ 2024-09-05 6:46 Jie Hai
2024-09-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] ethdev: verify queue ID when Tx done cleanup Jie Hai
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jie Hai @ 2024-09-05 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, thomas, ferruh.yigit; +Cc: lihuisong, fengchengwen, haijie1
This patch set make clean codes.
Chengwen Feng (4):
ethdev: verify queue ID when Tx done cleanup
net/hns3: verify reset type from firmware
dmadev: fix potential null pointer access
dmadev: clean code for verify parameter
drivers/net/hns3/hns3_intr.c | 6 ++++++
lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
2.22.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/4] ethdev: verify queue ID when Tx done cleanup
2024-09-05 6:46 [PATCH 0/4] clean code for dmadev and hns3 Jie Hai
@ 2024-09-05 6:46 ` Jie Hai
2024-09-05 7:33 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2024-09-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] net/hns3: verify reset type from firmware Jie Hai
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jie Hai @ 2024-09-05 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, thomas, ferruh.yigit, Andrew Rybchenko, Keith Wiles, Billy McFall
Cc: lihuisong, fengchengwen, haijie1
From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Verify queue_id for rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup API.
Fixes: 44a718c457b5 ("ethdev: add API to free consumed buffers in Tx ring")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
---
lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
index f1c658f49e80..998deb5ab101 100644
--- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
@@ -2823,6 +2823,10 @@ rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue_id, uint32_t free_cnt)
RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
+ ret = eth_dev_validate_tx_queue(dev, queue_id);
+ if (ret != 0)
+ return ret;
+
if (*dev->dev_ops->tx_done_cleanup == NULL)
return -ENOTSUP;
--
2.22.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/4] net/hns3: verify reset type from firmware
2024-09-05 6:46 [PATCH 0/4] clean code for dmadev and hns3 Jie Hai
2024-09-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] ethdev: verify queue ID when Tx done cleanup Jie Hai
@ 2024-09-05 6:46 ` Jie Hai
2024-09-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] dmadev: fix potential null pointer access Jie Hai
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jie Hai @ 2024-09-05 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, thomas, ferruh.yigit, Yisen Zhuang, Hongbo Zheng, Min Hu (Connor)
Cc: lihuisong, fengchengwen, haijie1
From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Verify reset-type which get from firmware.
Fixes: 1c1eb759e9d7 ("net/hns3: support RAS process in Kunpeng 930")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
---
drivers/net/hns3/hns3_intr.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_intr.c b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_intr.c
index 26fa2eb951bc..86c44f7cc3bc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_intr.c
+++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_intr.c
@@ -2252,6 +2252,12 @@ hns3_handle_module_error_data(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint32_t *buf,
sum_err_info = (struct hns3_sum_err_info *)&buf[offset++];
mod_num = sum_err_info->mod_num;
reset_type = sum_err_info->reset_type;
+
+ if (reset_type >= HNS3_MAX_RESET) {
+ hns3_err(hw, "invalid reset type = %u", reset_type);
+ return;
+ }
+
if (reset_type && reset_type != HNS3_NONE_RESET)
hns3_atomic_set_bit(reset_type, &hw->reset.request);
--
2.22.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4] dmadev: fix potential null pointer access
2024-09-05 6:46 [PATCH 0/4] clean code for dmadev and hns3 Jie Hai
2024-09-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] ethdev: verify queue ID when Tx done cleanup Jie Hai
2024-09-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] net/hns3: verify reset type from firmware Jie Hai
@ 2024-09-05 6:46 ` Jie Hai
2024-09-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] dmadev: clean code for verify parameter Jie Hai
2024-10-12 9:31 ` [PATCH 0/4] clean code for dmadev and hns3 Jie Hai
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jie Hai @ 2024-09-05 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, thomas, ferruh.yigit, Chengwen Feng, Kevin Laatz,
Bruce Richardson, Conor Walsh
Cc: lihuisong, haijie1
From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
When rte_dma_vchan_status(dev_id, vchan, NULL) is called, a null pointer
access is triggered.
This patch adds the null pointer checker.
Fixes: 5e0f85912754 ("dmadev: add channel status check for testing use")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
---
lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.c b/lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.c
index 845727210fab..60c3d8ebf68e 100644
--- a/lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.c
+++ b/lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.c
@@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ rte_dma_vchan_status(int16_t dev_id, uint16_t vchan, enum rte_dma_vchan_status *
{
struct rte_dma_dev *dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
- if (!rte_dma_is_valid(dev_id))
+ if (!rte_dma_is_valid(dev_id) || status == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
if (vchan >= dev->data->dev_conf.nb_vchans) {
--
2.22.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] dmadev: clean code for verify parameter
2024-09-05 6:46 [PATCH 0/4] clean code for dmadev and hns3 Jie Hai
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] dmadev: fix potential null pointer access Jie Hai
@ 2024-09-05 6:46 ` Jie Hai
2024-10-12 9:31 ` [PATCH 0/4] clean code for dmadev and hns3 Jie Hai
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jie Hai @ 2024-09-05 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, thomas, ferruh.yigit, Chengwen Feng, Kevin Laatz, Bruce Richardson
Cc: lihuisong, haijie1
From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Make sure to verify the 'dev_id' parameter before using them.
Note: there is no actual problem with the current code, but it is
recommended to clean it up.
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
---
lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.c b/lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.c
index 60c3d8ebf68e..4ba3b9380c5f 100644
--- a/lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.c
+++ b/lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.c
@@ -436,11 +436,12 @@ rte_dma_count_avail(void)
int
rte_dma_info_get(int16_t dev_id, struct rte_dma_info *dev_info)
{
- const struct rte_dma_dev *dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
+ const struct rte_dma_dev *dev;
int ret;
if (!rte_dma_is_valid(dev_id) || dev_info == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
+ dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
if (*dev->dev_ops->dev_info_get == NULL)
return -ENOTSUP;
@@ -462,12 +463,13 @@ rte_dma_info_get(int16_t dev_id, struct rte_dma_info *dev_info)
int
rte_dma_configure(int16_t dev_id, const struct rte_dma_conf *dev_conf)
{
- struct rte_dma_dev *dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
struct rte_dma_info dev_info;
+ struct rte_dma_dev *dev;
int ret;
if (!rte_dma_is_valid(dev_id) || dev_conf == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
+ dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
if (dev->data->dev_started != 0) {
RTE_DMA_LOG(ERR,
@@ -513,11 +515,12 @@ rte_dma_configure(int16_t dev_id, const struct rte_dma_conf *dev_conf)
int
rte_dma_start(int16_t dev_id)
{
- struct rte_dma_dev *dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
+ struct rte_dma_dev *dev;
int ret;
if (!rte_dma_is_valid(dev_id))
return -EINVAL;
+ dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
if (dev->data->dev_conf.nb_vchans == 0) {
RTE_DMA_LOG(ERR, "Device %d must be configured first", dev_id);
@@ -545,11 +548,12 @@ rte_dma_start(int16_t dev_id)
int
rte_dma_stop(int16_t dev_id)
{
- struct rte_dma_dev *dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
+ struct rte_dma_dev *dev;
int ret;
if (!rte_dma_is_valid(dev_id))
return -EINVAL;
+ dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
if (dev->data->dev_started == 0) {
RTE_DMA_LOG(WARNING, "Device %d already stopped", dev_id);
@@ -572,11 +576,12 @@ rte_dma_stop(int16_t dev_id)
int
rte_dma_close(int16_t dev_id)
{
- struct rte_dma_dev *dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
+ struct rte_dma_dev *dev;
int ret;
if (!rte_dma_is_valid(dev_id))
return -EINVAL;
+ dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
/* Device must be stopped before it can be closed */
if (dev->data->dev_started == 1) {
@@ -600,13 +605,14 @@ int
rte_dma_vchan_setup(int16_t dev_id, uint16_t vchan,
const struct rte_dma_vchan_conf *conf)
{
- struct rte_dma_dev *dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
struct rte_dma_info dev_info;
bool src_is_dev, dst_is_dev;
+ struct rte_dma_dev *dev;
int ret;
if (!rte_dma_is_valid(dev_id) || conf == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
+ dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
if (dev->data->dev_started != 0) {
RTE_DMA_LOG(ERR,
@@ -693,10 +699,11 @@ rte_dma_vchan_setup(int16_t dev_id, uint16_t vchan,
int
rte_dma_stats_get(int16_t dev_id, uint16_t vchan, struct rte_dma_stats *stats)
{
- const struct rte_dma_dev *dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
+ const struct rte_dma_dev *dev;
if (!rte_dma_is_valid(dev_id) || stats == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
+ dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
if (vchan >= dev->data->dev_conf.nb_vchans &&
vchan != RTE_DMA_ALL_VCHAN) {
@@ -715,11 +722,12 @@ rte_dma_stats_get(int16_t dev_id, uint16_t vchan, struct rte_dma_stats *stats)
int
rte_dma_stats_reset(int16_t dev_id, uint16_t vchan)
{
- struct rte_dma_dev *dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
+ struct rte_dma_dev *dev;
int ret;
if (!rte_dma_is_valid(dev_id))
return -EINVAL;
+ dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
if (vchan >= dev->data->dev_conf.nb_vchans &&
vchan != RTE_DMA_ALL_VCHAN) {
@@ -739,10 +747,11 @@ rte_dma_stats_reset(int16_t dev_id, uint16_t vchan)
int
rte_dma_vchan_status(int16_t dev_id, uint16_t vchan, enum rte_dma_vchan_status *status)
{
- struct rte_dma_dev *dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
+ struct rte_dma_dev *dev;
if (!rte_dma_is_valid(dev_id) || status == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
+ dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
if (vchan >= dev->data->dev_conf.nb_vchans) {
RTE_DMA_LOG(ERR, "Device %u vchan %u out of range", dev_id, vchan);
@@ -804,12 +813,13 @@ dma_dump_capability(FILE *f, uint64_t dev_capa)
int
rte_dma_dump(int16_t dev_id, FILE *f)
{
- const struct rte_dma_dev *dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
+ const struct rte_dma_dev *dev;
struct rte_dma_info dev_info;
int ret;
if (!rte_dma_is_valid(dev_id) || f == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
+ dev = &rte_dma_devices[dev_id];
ret = rte_dma_info_get(dev_id, &dev_info);
if (ret != 0) {
--
2.22.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/4] ethdev: verify queue ID when Tx done cleanup
2024-09-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] ethdev: verify queue ID when Tx done cleanup Jie Hai
@ 2024-09-05 7:33 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2024-10-12 2:27 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Rybchenko @ 2024-09-05 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jie Hai, dev, thomas, ferruh.yigit, Keith Wiles, Billy McFall
Cc: lihuisong, fengchengwen
On 9/5/24 09:46, Jie Hai wrote:
> From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
>
> Verify queue_id for rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup API.
If I'm not mistaken the function is considered data path API (fast).
If so, it should not validate it's parameters as in rte_eth_tx_burst().
It may be done under RTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG_TX only.
May be documentation should be fixed to highlight it.
And yes, current implementation looks inconsistent from this point of
view since port_id and presence of callback are checked.
Anyway motivation in the patch description is insufficient.
>
> Fixes: 44a718c457b5 ("ethdev: add API to free consumed buffers in Tx ring")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> ---
> lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> index f1c658f49e80..998deb5ab101 100644
> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -2823,6 +2823,10 @@ rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue_id, uint32_t free_cnt)
> RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
> dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
>
> + ret = eth_dev_validate_tx_queue(dev, queue_id);
> + if (ret != 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> if (*dev->dev_ops->tx_done_cleanup == NULL)
> return -ENOTSUP;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/4] ethdev: verify queue ID when Tx done cleanup
2024-09-05 7:33 ` Andrew Rybchenko
@ 2024-10-12 2:27 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-10-12 9:14 ` fengchengwen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2024-10-12 2:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Rybchenko, Jie Hai, lihuisong, fengchengwen
Cc: dev, thomas, Keith Wiles, Billy McFall
On 9/5/2024 8:33 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 9/5/24 09:46, Jie Hai wrote:
>> From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
>>
>> Verify queue_id for rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup API.
>
> If I'm not mistaken the function is considered data path API (fast).
> If so, it should not validate it's parameters as in rte_eth_tx_burst().
> It may be done under RTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG_TX only.
>
> May be documentation should be fixed to highlight it.
>
> And yes, current implementation looks inconsistent from this point of
> view since port_id and presence of callback are checked.
>
> Anyway motivation in the patch description is insufficient.
>
Hi Chengwen,
I agree with Andrew, to not add checks to the datapath function.
Can you please explain more why this check is needed at first place?
Is it for a specific usecase?
>>
>> Fixes: 44a718c457b5 ("ethdev: add API to free consumed buffers in Tx
>> ring")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>> index f1c658f49e80..998deb5ab101 100644
>> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>> @@ -2823,6 +2823,10 @@ rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup(uint16_t port_id,
>> uint16_t queue_id, uint32_t free_cnt)
>> RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
>> dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
>> + ret = eth_dev_validate_tx_queue(dev, queue_id);
>> + if (ret != 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> if (*dev->dev_ops->tx_done_cleanup == NULL)
>> return -ENOTSUP;
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/4] ethdev: verify queue ID when Tx done cleanup
2024-10-12 2:27 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2024-10-12 9:14 ` fengchengwen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: fengchengwen @ 2024-10-12 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit, Andrew Rybchenko, Jie Hai, lihuisong
Cc: dev, thomas, Keith Wiles, Billy McFall
On 2024/10/12 10:27, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 9/5/2024 8:33 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
>> On 9/5/24 09:46, Jie Hai wrote:
>>> From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
>>>
>>> Verify queue_id for rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup API.
>>
>> If I'm not mistaken the function is considered data path API (fast).
>> If so, it should not validate it's parameters as in rte_eth_tx_burst().
>> It may be done under RTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG_TX only.
>>
>> May be documentation should be fixed to highlight it.
>>
>> And yes, current implementation looks inconsistent from this point of
>> view since port_id and presence of callback are checked.
>>
>> Anyway motivation in the patch description is insufficient.
>>
>
> Hi Chengwen,
>
> I agree with Andrew, to not add checks to the datapath function.
>
> Can you please explain more why this check is needed at first place?
> Is it for a specific usecase?
Hi Ferruh,
It was triggered by our internal security review.
I think it's okay to add the check under RTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG_TX. and Haijie will send v2.
Thanks
>
>>>
>>> Fixes: 44a718c457b5 ("ethdev: add API to free consumed buffers in Tx
>>> ring")
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 4 ++++
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>>> index f1c658f49e80..998deb5ab101 100644
>>> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>>> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>>> @@ -2823,6 +2823,10 @@ rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup(uint16_t port_id,
>>> uint16_t queue_id, uint32_t free_cnt)
>>> RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
>>> dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
>>> + ret = eth_dev_validate_tx_queue(dev, queue_id);
>>> + if (ret != 0)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> if (*dev->dev_ops->tx_done_cleanup == NULL)
>>> return -ENOTSUP;
>>>
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/4] clean code for dmadev and hns3
2024-09-05 6:46 [PATCH 0/4] clean code for dmadev and hns3 Jie Hai
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] dmadev: clean code for verify parameter Jie Hai
@ 2024-10-12 9:31 ` Jie Hai
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jie Hai @ 2024-10-12 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, thomas, ferruh.yigit; +Cc: lihuisong, fengchengwen
On 2024/9/5 14:46, Jie Hai wrote:
The patch set will be seperate into 3 part and resend, please see
patch[1/4]
https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20241012091437.21382-1-haijie1@huawei.com/
patch[2/4]
https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20241012091457.21554-1-haijie1@huawei.com/
patch[3/4][4/4]
https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20241012091735.24012-1-haijie1@huawei.com/
> This patch set make clean codes.
>
> Chengwen Feng (4):
> ethdev: verify queue ID when Tx done cleanup
> net/hns3: verify reset type from firmware
> dmadev: fix potential null pointer access
> dmadev: clean code for verify parameter
>
> drivers/net/hns3/hns3_intr.c | 6 ++++++
> lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-10-12 9:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-09-05 6:46 [PATCH 0/4] clean code for dmadev and hns3 Jie Hai
2024-09-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] ethdev: verify queue ID when Tx done cleanup Jie Hai
2024-09-05 7:33 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2024-10-12 2:27 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-10-12 9:14 ` fengchengwen
2024-09-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] net/hns3: verify reset type from firmware Jie Hai
2024-09-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] dmadev: fix potential null pointer access Jie Hai
2024-09-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] dmadev: clean code for verify parameter Jie Hai
2024-10-12 9:31 ` [PATCH 0/4] clean code for dmadev and hns3 Jie Hai
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).