From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
Cc: getelson@nvidia.com, dev@dpdk.org, matan@nvidia.com,
Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
ferruh.yigit@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: flow rule removal on port stop
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 17:55:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2076472.bjLukMjepe@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201118161520.4378-1-getelson@nvidia.com>
Andrew, any comment on this v2?
(disclosure: I did not read it)
18/11/2020 17:15, Gregory Etelson:
> There is a discrepancy between RTE ETHDEV API and flow rules guide
> regarding flow rules maintenance after port stop. RTE ETHDEV API in
> librte_ethdev.h declares that flow rules will not be stored in PMD
> after port stop:
> >>>>> Quite start
> Please note that some configuration is not stored between calls to
> rte_eth_dev_stop()/rte_eth_dev_start(). The following configuration
> will be retained:
>
> - MTU
> - flow control settings
> - receive mode configuration (promiscuous mode, all-multicast mode,
> hardware checksum mode, RSS/VMDQ settings etc.)
> - VLAN filtering configuration
> - default MAC address
> - MAC addresses supplied to MAC address array
> - flow director filtering mode (but not filtering rules)
> - NIC queue statistics mappings
> <<<< Quote end
>
> PMD cannot always correctly restore flow rules after port stop / port
> start because application may alter port configuration after port stop
> without PMD knowledge about undergoing changes. Consider the
> following scenario:
> application configures 2 queues 0 and 1 and creates a flow rule with
> 'queue index 1' action. After that application stops the port and
> removes queue 1.
> Although PMD can implement flow rule shadow copy to be used for
> restore after port start, attempt to restore flow rule from shadow
> will fail in example above and PMD could not notify application about
> that failure. As the result, flow rules map in HW will differ from
> what application expects. In addition, flow rules shadow copy used
> for port start restore consumes considerable amount of system memory,
> especially in systems with millions of flow rules.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
> ---
> doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> index ea203e0ca4..4cff9332fa 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> @@ -3229,10 +3229,12 @@ Caveats
> temporarily replacing the burst function pointers), an appropriate error
> code must be returned (``EBUSY``).
>
> -- PMDs, not applications, are responsible for maintaining flow rules
> - configuration when stopping and restarting a port or performing other
> - actions which may affect them. They can only be destroyed explicitly by
> - applications.
> +- Applications, not PMDs, are responsible for maintaining flow rules
> + configuration when closing, stopping or restarting a port or performing other
> + actions which may affect them.
> + Applications must assume that after port close, stop or restart all flows
> + related to that port are not valid, hardware rules are destroyed and relevant
> + PMD resources are released.
>
> For devices exposing multiple ports sharing global settings affected by flow
> rules:
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-22 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-16 11:18 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Gregory Etelson
2020-11-17 19:18 ` Gregory Etelson
2020-11-17 19:56 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-11-18 8:59 ` Gregory Etelson
2020-11-18 9:04 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-11-18 9:06 ` Gregory Etelson
2020-11-18 16:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Gregory Etelson
2020-11-22 16:55 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-11-24 11:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-24 14:41 ` Ajit Khaparde
2020-11-25 23:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2076472.bjLukMjepe@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=getelson@nvidia.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).