From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9878FA0530;
	Tue, 21 Jan 2020 01:24:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AA91BFD4;
	Tue, 21 Jan 2020 01:24:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0571BFB5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 01:24:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E032321B6A;
 Mon, 20 Jan 2020 19:24:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 19:24:15 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp;
 bh=3mkEdm/4n/U2fJ1WhB0kGEWf9tj3B0FXpyCVq7Pfybs=; b=hNuok9ryrAsb
 Bz1y8VhDj1Oqdt/F3aNYbJG2+GArDAWguE6ASe0j458R3hfcstTe8/OWNjtgyc+C
 aAC4B5bpfyuSIUpCrhNJ3+KNSVYmVtsOWE0PBBDr0enn21XjUzY4OlHlA+LU7Jgg
 TvEyrzcw5KEacIPZReUEOCOxdKqJK4c=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=3mkEdm/4n/U2fJ1WhB0kGEWf9tj3B0FXpyCVq7Pfy
 bs=; b=YQbPRxPykjs1BpOMKc10vgFjX7a2OtQqRbWi8Y1Dbb7j3c0wr2lga42CL
 U2dtJwqTyL5oHUIXJ5HNZtEMWreKyi/bH4TPZsKFWBiof3sKrKBSc/RontBEMuJB
 ppzuo5slpbPQ1en3ryi9g0ORUevQD5e3uIlo+7ShqUdgq6U+btYAeJlYQQe2kWPK
 DqXvuGmCTB8kQYRrwBgJhnOUCxsFHq8jo4vWb/f/vFTQ+GanJFE/E+L2IMfleeJq
 GOF4kFcQ6SShMztWW9tnDUwLQeDKLdOJtEP7nvTy3XYr5T43xzq3r58QQZSJJmSd
 i9auoGa9ZyEHb/zAIJfySknBOgOAw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:r0QmXhAP6Ny3mhhV5SpwuQlPbiZpo0EoLVhChk_GFvNYwIJjgQ-2lA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudejgddulecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf
 curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu
 uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc
 fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs
 ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph
 epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghr
 rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:r0QmXqPPwy2bXyr3NhxzR8CHSE2SRbYISPxGSkWtNeIBPDDmBxhi9Q>
 <xmx:r0QmXlSksdqX91jB4RQZjbCx6XPx_wBxuKfau0FsLoLuN0JRq6OcjQ>
 <xmx:r0QmXi4SrMbwR2oszw2MwrJHVb-ssqPjmKQL-39B3jmEGGbYUhJzCw>
 <xmx:r0QmXqbCSJ3CsC43gbVjFKfK0drSypA7Sx_TacBElSzQBg5CeI5B4A>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A911D3060B1E;
 Mon, 20 Jan 2020 19:24:14 -0500 (EST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, aconole@redhat.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 01:24:12 +0100
Message-ID: <2076701.vBoWY3egPC@xps>
In-Reply-To: <20191202153559.9709-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
References: <20191202153559.9709-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Extend --lcores to run on cores >
	RTE_MAX_LCORE
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

02/12/2019 16:35, David Marchand:
> We are currently stuck with no option but recompile a DPDK if the system
> has more cores than RTE_MAX_LCORE.
> A bit of a pity when you get a system with more than 200+ cores and your
> testpmd has been built and packaged with RTE_MAX_LCORE == 128.
> 
> The --lcores does not need to care about the underlying cores, remove
> this limitation.

> David Marchand (4):
>   eal/windows: fix cpuset macro name
>   eal: do not cache lcore detection state
>   eal: display all detected cores at startup
>   eal: remove limitation on cpuset with --lcores

The patches look good but it is very hard to review parsing code (last patch).
We will better experience corner cases after merging.

Applied for -rc1, thanks