From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD8941D39; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 09:01:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC97A40697; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 09:01:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9205740693 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 09:01:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1217A5C00E6; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 03:01:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Feb 2023 03:01:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1677052879; x= 1677139279; bh=c3CPraMIx0AuOPiB2vtT/m9OQ5aWa9euv7fmE35d1ig=; b=U HWiBnHSrK8eNLEjp75OtLEB5YLq/OYq7+iPfD40fkozb4POU7d1jKYRJrtSNv82d FwKa3eNwn6Oa+eZhqXoUSB4qj+znfQXV9/Zxy+D6ofH/G9HFDbQfO0K+fODcgiMp 9Q2R0S2whVCqn0QbJgMVqOSaSNK9+O4jq7B385mSaLaaQMkM34yJJLLzcfyEtyO1 g6Ku75Z3Ay0ZpHIBXkfuNsiKQLa63DuCeCDXZ7T1iNdQuQVKkD/G0hTMa0P3E5NP /jdVsuAdDPyObKh5u/qcbBwr9XcRDTh/uBxUfAiXtp0p5vPseqXbUTU5OY8w7oQK /e9r6mol/cxGJHaQL3iYQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1677052879; x= 1677139279; bh=c3CPraMIx0AuOPiB2vtT/m9OQ5aWa9euv7fmE35d1ig=; b=T +GgzdyE3v4S37X5kX93qH7t0uMvbj4e4WWvVMPqta0WTq8UlDd1Yi+0LqDAqhBd3 hBDdPUQmmUYXR6S8zUPBODfkUt+S5zlaKJEuMy4CYgANdhqOEcHenDvmJX8vfHNJ RZZZtKzETKCzZjZMuNB8jI1n0BfwyB5lN/bUsOnxq978CX3Zc6l7ZiMd7eH3wcll kKsz8aF1WBfrgwzQA3zoQwSebm1b7YQoijfLMpPKaMDbDNAxYkYjt7s30NuluLf+ u599FkvlFQeBCXewyiI1BcJRBejtpsQmr+MMAisyI1RoXShyPxSNx2BvwakUtXGS byHlJmPP/ThVLf6w1gmnA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudejkedgudduvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtqhertddttddunecuhfhrohhmpefvhhho mhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgeejiedvleehudfhuefgfeevgfehieetgeeigffggfffffei uefgueektdeffeevnecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 03:01:16 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "olivier.matz@6wind.com" , "andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" , Morten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= , Kamalakshitha Aligeri Cc: "Yuying.Zhang@intel.com" , "beilei.xing@intel.com" , "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , "konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com" , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Ruifeng Wang , Feifei Wang , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" , nd Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] test/mempool: add zero-copy API's Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 09:01:14 +0100 Message-ID: <2080056.htQpZWrp2x@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20230209062501.142828-1-kamalakshitha.aligeri@arm.com> <3270737.0oRPG1VZx4@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 21/02/2023 21:18, Kamalakshitha Aligeri: > Hi Thomas, >=20 > Do you want me to squash the unit tests in the mempool lib patch or do I = have to wait for the reviews from mempool maintainers Yes I think you can do the squash if Morten agrees. > From: Thomas Monjalon > > 10/02/2023 08:33, Morten Br=F8rup: > > > > From: Kamalakshitha Aligeri [mailto:kamalakshitha.aligeri@arm.com] > > > > Sent: Friday, 10 February 2023 07.54 > > > > > > > > Added mempool test cases with zero-copy get and put API's > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kamalakshitha Aligeri > > > > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang > > > > Reviewed-by: Feifei Wang > > > > > > I already acked v1 of this patch, but here it is again for Patchwork: > > > > > > Acked-by: Morten Br=F8rup > > > > > > > --- > > > > Link: > > > > > > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20230209145833.129986-1- > > > > mb@smartsharesystems.com/ > > > > > > @David, here's the zero-copy mempool cache API test cases you were > > asking for. > >=20 > > The unit tests should be squashed in the mempool lib patch. > >=20 > > Also I would to see a review from the mempool maintainers. > >=20 >=20 >=20