From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C20CA04EF; Mon, 25 May 2020 08:59:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A101D6F1; Mon, 25 May 2020 08:59:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new2-smtp.messagingengine.com (new2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.224]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051CF1D6E6 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 08:59:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571FD5800B5; Mon, 25 May 2020 02:59:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 25 May 2020 02:59:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= ig7s0xyx+4HYH+aPZkIu+Yk4djrtPUvbBS8LM9YUym8=; b=ezXlaTY4viT291Gn 06PhO5KbgAtUXiVP4sswBW9USOwNql0eM5FxtPjQ6BtknOPio66Ni06gng/niwvb uWlajzsEVw3opMFJPeIuEEc7Bk34UQAIxOXQ+3//deUTWnKVltc7V1RSrf8Ls+yi TyJR9kb2zBygv52+CzitD4m/pPx3goUNLSfICm+pE6sFri8r3sskFLwl/VoHwLsj hfx1YkzGww/WbL/KinMqtm0OdC1spYq9QT/+RQEzutXK8V0ra+6e+3gH9sb6wXZr x7h/Oul1gKs+hkI7NNBte5HZOZeB1nbhVR61hwe4t/QoeZOg7+tp/fweVco01WyQ zJNu9Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ig7s0xyx+4HYH+aPZkIu+Yk4djrtPUvbBS8LM9YUy m8=; b=f5zflAUkHPu8HcJuOf4MPzXbfkAo4j9cfU7uhv5zE65EcDcZI+M8Tuzq4 cBEhgVWPpkXIs7E0IfPJI+RxrmDgHeAU3GJUmCJ8MXAlLRu+Ya03XBwIWITQE9Pa 3dmUgQmRydLEAnxN15UE1TUU1pq4LI11ui0PZ1DEsG8jftC1lrOMrrMzhB/ANRwo 71pORYNcRy0E9OhUSOgzBY4Vjb5hF6LBGRkdzo/9GFNwkrnSXCxBK/9B+dZ1MYpz K69agp8cEECoL0yhvU41e4joxfOgx3d6QiRxFOb+MSxb1pafnN7RAd1CZBOxnUtq H9W7lQcVBHZEkvLDduNEFT9MseD9w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudduledgudduvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeukedvieettefhteeiueeludffuedtgeefhedutefgffekieff jedvieelvedukeenucffohhmrghinhepohhffhhitggvrdgtohhmpdguphgukhdrohhrgh enucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptden ucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C9523306654D; Mon, 25 May 2020 02:59:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Dmitry Kozlyuk Cc: Tasnim Bashar , dev@dpdk.org, harini.ramakrishnan@microsoft.com, pallavi.kadam@intel.com, ranjit.menon@intel.com, ocardona@microsoft.com, navasile@linux.microsoft.com, talshn@mellanox.com, fady@mellanox.com, ophirmu@mellanox.com Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 08:59:44 +0200 Message-ID: <2082863.3YbMk6PUyX@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200525040212.3f5b262a@sovereign> References: <20200525040212.3f5b262a@sovereign> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal/windows: fix invalid thread handle X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 25/05/2020 03:02, Dmitry Kozlyuk: > On Sat, 23 May 2020 00:25:56 -0700 > Tasnim Bashar wrote: > > > Casting thread ID to handle is not accurate way to get thread handle. > > Need to use OpenThread function to get thread handle from thread ID. > > > > pthread_setaffinity_np and pthread_getaffinity_np functions > > for Windows are affected because of it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tasnim Bashar > > --- > > Please use --in-reply-to=Message-ID-of-previous-version to send v2, etc. I should update the doc to ask replying to the first patch. > If you're using Outlook, you can find message ID as follows: > > https://support.office.com/en-us/article/view-internet-message-headers-in-outlook-cd039382-dc6e-4264-ac74-c048563d212c You can also find the message ID in patchwork or inbox.dpdk.org. > For example, this is how this patch should have been sent: > > git send-email --in-reply-to=20200522001112.48932-1-tbashar@mellanox.com ...