From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8D2A0579; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:01:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FED40698; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:01:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1736540138 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:01:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9435C008D; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 04:01:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 08 Apr 2021 04:01:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= uqvJuLIdjFf4YrkMwLxvZoMF9T9pldcMfmBdLT0m46M=; b=hmDQs6wGuMWfQKoy fvDiCIGlyO+SNu3O+US5Dn0HkAD8q6U9JH2Gm+olOg5j7e+Le8c3eKXbjM84oZZC 3nY+PlQrAlVFydbkFm9kB7JUVoYVnUqdEPixciG8YuSxVZ0Akm+uJ1p9CminfaRQ yKcUBGczH4AasyEsYjc0Pfgtt9Ap4Gngxp1lKcKkJYGF521gyQJ2JYL7REscKBpP z8Ocjgd/IM7AO1+d+mgIvNDQohwlFNUOAaC2fp7D1KixsX0oqq3uWR2ewAG4YaeN PHpKE98jJqSLUW8tWrmiwKZ3nDrJf0qzjPzmyjc482bzYQ6CuUAq6nNq6X7dItME 4MwfGQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=uqvJuLIdjFf4YrkMwLxvZoMF9T9pldcMfmBdLT0m4 6M=; b=UR4HVtR2I6J3jkwX3iq17yM8NGCivcxlho8kVQpkFUMHwBnZn+le0TZgF jpbQ5zaX/7k90o5bH1nV0CpzOIScfMVS/DZ3NORkaN+5/I0kkWDdjeyxF7Kga6h1 HtlnZjOiWsd4sSZXem23IvGgCZP6W0T3F3bS7hCQePMeYCeV/jHTnA5dvJn+ZH4a 7aa06KxxI2nIMcNeDBaRf32OVzsK7Z8guLutrjYrUo+d3ZzLPE8V3EZry0ZjZs9+ jfop6APhZgloy6XLrZuZdiw+JEzfQZnG/kmMELnnTuB/1K+dPa1EhtPm+7xweagm x0/SC68W8MCSpsLqRbHrzbe3wPXog== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudejkedguddvjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvkeetveeihfegfedtfeejueekkeekueevgfejuedviedvvdev uefgteevtdefveenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefge drvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhl fhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7F5F2108005F; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 04:01:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: oulijun Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli , "linuxarm@openeuler.org" , Ferruh Yigit , dev , nd Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 10:01:25 +0200 Message-ID: <2091548.b8ayvqcoMn@thomas> In-Reply-To: <4d7f9872-bc46-29f7-55e9-c7948714accd@huawei.com> References: <1612356396-21309-1-git-send-email-oulijun@huawei.com> <4d7f9872-bc46-29f7-55e9-c7948714accd@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [Linuxarm] [PATCH V2 0/4] add Hisilicon kunpeng CPU support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 08/04/2021 05:30, oulijun: > =E5=9C=A8 2021/4/7 10:19, Honnappa Nagarahalli =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > >>>> =E5=9C=A8 2021/3/25 22:40, Thomas Monjalon =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > >>>>> 25/03/2021 14:26, oulijun: > >>>>>> =E5=9C=A8 2021/3/25 20:19, Thomas Monjalon =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > >>>>>>> 25/03/2021 12:17, oulijun: > >>>>>>>> Ruifeng has reviewed-by. Does anyone else have any comments? Is > >>>>>>>> it necessary to send the V2? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> v2 for what? There is a change? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> No. no change. > >>>>> > >>>>> So why are you asking to send a v2? > >>>>> > >>>> Sorry. My suggestion is to ask if you need to reset the patch based > >>>> on the latest date. If not, wait for other's reviews and to incorpor= ate the > >> patch. > >>>>> > >>> I suggest to rework this patch once [1] is merged. > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/1617186371-18699-1-git-send > >>> -email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech/ > >>> > >> I checked it out, and this series has not been received, and I don't t= hink it can > >> be reworked based on it. > > It would be good to review the series, test it on your platform and pro= vide any comments you might have. It will help make progress on the series. > >=20 > Hi, Thomas && Ferruh Yigit > What's your opinion? Help in review is always good. Please review what you can.