Re: [PATCH v1 03/11] test/bbdev: rename macros from acc200 to vrb

[Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>]

On 9/29/23 20:13, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> Renaming ACC200 macros to use generic intel vRAN Boost (VRB).
> No functional impact.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
> ---
>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>   1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> index faea26c10eed..d4c001de0093 100644
> --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> @@ -64,14 +64,14 @@
>   #define ACC100_QMGR_INVALID_IDX -1
>   #define ACC100_QMGR_RR 1
>   #define ACC100_QOS_GBR 0
> -#define ACC200PF_DRIVER_NAME   ("intel_acc200_pf")
> -#define ACC200VF_DRIVER_NAME   ("intel_acc200_vf")
> -#define ACC200_QMGR_NUM_AQS 16
> -#define ACC200_QMGR_NUM_QGS 2
> -#define ACC200_QMGR_AQ_DEPTH 5
> -#define ACC200_QMGR_INVALID_IDX -1
> -#define ACC200_QMGR_RR 1
> -#define ACC200_QOS_GBR 0
> +#define VRBPF_DRIVER_NAME   ("intel_vran_boost_pf")
> +#define VRBVF_DRIVER_NAME   ("intel_vran_boost_vf")

Should it be a fix, since the driver name changed in an earlier version?