From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABD32BCC
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  9 May 2016 10:39:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id g17so173304739wme.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 09 May 2016 01:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent
 :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=UPeyiCcS3QHizX+005Oc2og47+gMDECpq6giDyn2mYM=;
 b=sMwBaflgWSzL9wHWd+155kw1h1w0zGgpuxnWlLu8SY4vEIkNC6KPR6t2jWfvI1vO8M
 8gQEzZzeGPeBZvNwkSS9J54ww9Ug8xcx1YBFtHOL1tDoaqWjnjOs3ZqJt2IMlMRmTpZm
 KubLAic/wCpA8aIOHmUM+4V7/700CK+vfLUDFj3PNNx78BFEa5CYPEsNWttcz40B+Pzc
 Y2noMVhoci+5Fvkomk7zjQ/EkbD3fR7qGFCm4Yssd3MQzcnms/yheiJ0wm5O9I9oviD7
 G6Ld7hONjQCWjIuuPK+kzBV6NiMy/QQg+hd4CM1Jg59OF6w1DLdzm0aexXAlVFRU6wZ+
 U5gg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=UPeyiCcS3QHizX+005Oc2og47+gMDECpq6giDyn2mYM=;
 b=m0q3c6juQ3SCLcjluDHitK7WQuKSk7RLGFeDR4bX8uWfPkBJ0OdIB29uHEWwh+veZ+
 IeyHJEFPcJqYtMmMPA6sAzUDjEYG+tomxgN/ZZZPTFVHnAs1VErJIKTkhNppGyJqbCnt
 c62snSB9jj9WpKEQa2GCic3oofD0Y98vux32TwbEyftE1JCNLDYvj0sqOCviUkWYlzBp
 aZesvxrGM8xNuhhwKvrrctICYUa4k9B16klQC5tPn61sFTatjw0EuhOUI1dtN8IemXHH
 UkS+VMLsnjikaLISo5Kv3aA/ownUKiHLVGPe/5XXFEtdZKElC7pZPB+AeGGxsfKDFvpm
 cpGQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUfJH/lO+EdeXYFPd9dVaECS7+J5eUJ3F9Pa6uVjF1SJHLOiy/PGG2Vd4uSnFJkNu8k
X-Received: by 10.194.42.69 with SMTP id m5mr32368660wjl.89.1462783189552;
 Mon, 09 May 2016 01:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c194sm23371196wme.9.2016.05.09.01.39.48
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Mon, 09 May 2016 01:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 10:39:47 +0200
Message-ID: <21220095.qH3WOBJJYD@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1462801702-30918-1-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
References: <1462801702-30918-1-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: Introduce NXP dpaa2 architecture based
	on armv8-a
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 08:39:49 -0000

2016-05-09 19:18, Hemant Agrawal:
> This patch introduces dpaa2 machine target to address difference
> in cpu parameter, number of core to 8 and no numa support
> w.r.t default armv8-a machine
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
[...]
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/mk/machine/dpaa2/rte.vars.mk
> +# ARCH =
> +# CROSS =
> +# MACHINE_CFLAGS =
> +# MACHINE_LDFLAGS =
> +# MACHINE_ASFLAGS =
> +# CPU_CFLAGS =
> +# CPU_LDFLAGS =
> +# CPU_ASFLAGS =
> +MACHINE_CFLAGS += -march=armv8-a
> +
> +ifdef CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM_TUNE
> +MACHINE_CFLAGS += -mcpu=$(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM_TUNE)
> +endif

There is nothing specific in this file.

> --- a/mk/rte.module.mk
> +++ b/mk/rte.module.mk
> +#### Linaro toolchain usages arm64 instread of aarch64 in kernel
> +ifeq ($(ARCH), aarch64)
> +ARCH = arm64
> +endif

Could you provide more explanations please?
aarch64 shouldn't be used I think.