From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A564A046B for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 19:07:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2F337B4; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 19:07:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE5A2C60 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 19:07:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E9321C4D; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 13:07:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 13:07:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=wcyaOOxEL2X0AFUF/CCQT8VJJevaAdB/Uwa6rOu4mAk=; b=WGDx2Bp6mOd5 D0DPC4Lz8oNJUMR84MiSKf8anclch+U6MueX+q+NHxikh3GDmOczUg1zI75VRxPr r5fhI5xCzdtt4GtbyW2HAnlaHiOB26z7ZjqgAHx6ng1pE8r+kc2Ja0vla38AkhC4 Ool7QCvA2Vv2nIMvz7OjDqmEzpSZOoc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=wcyaOOxEL2X0AFUF/CCQT8VJJevaAdB/Uwa6rOu4m Ak=; b=opVO5+VNIQNsqum/pq/ipm+XTMX2wF6OPum8xdMjBiIalPQRF2zLeYYCp BJMehJSRAoDkZDYAL4WIyhSnqyvFbcHeGf0Sn15admz8CDblvs5WbfqJgRmstiIV eNxIpZvxP95LVPdye/enLEJ1ZeO3saO1AlF4Pbkcb3oYqbI/ny7ywV5nVlzpd2o/ DDUjiRaXXcLS0Py8YsapM12QfeLKjUyLNy9yM7qSb61bteQz3D7PWD4fJORou1z5 I2lu9Jg4OF5esiLOjx6cMobOXSvn3X2IKkJMeqJGrt+PyTa+m789mlP4Fif235ap CAuUgcKw6T74tVpcGB4yltKia1SMQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrvddvgdduuddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 58D498005C; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 13:06:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, stephen@networkplumber.org Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 19:06:56 +0200 Message-ID: <2123522.W70hLPZofc@xps> In-Reply-To: <1561809533-6545-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com> References: <1561635235-22238-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com> <1561809533-6545-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/10] experimental tags fixes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 29/06/2019 13:58, David Marchand: > Following the build error reported by Aaron [1], I noticed that some > experimental functions could go unnoticed because of a gcc peculiarity. > > To catch those, I went and added a new check on the object files to > ensure that any experimental api flagged in the map files is really > exported as such. > > Then went with my previous idea of only adding the tags on the functions > prototypes and enforcing it (a new check in checkpatches.sh). > And finally enforcing that the __rte_experimental tag is always the first > part of a function prototype which seems to work with both gcc and clang. Applied, thanks