From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149812BD9 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:47:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id u206so25520721wme.1 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 07:47:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FJ9q1eHPXsotvtk9RmNgCrR2O/0SMuldMHMNSMBcpWs=; b=LiAkCPjOU9wF2XvuTHy5E8sz0f4SH7LE4Z/uWWXQPsiUAeU9jDEiL1XS9HbWpASyGz o2yKtf9ZTbibDgSYPXXuWIsCO7ZKPNJ1GD3R4mjXq1jdMJdyhFAMl1pAvd/iL5FWTghY +UbsPRz09IV7AXxJgKVfrlS8GgDacNai2vt4uMEILKyyfA9xgrnnLNDe1MgpHVvgvudq naLYf7oJQ5NZdDCAPi0A6yeoPY9eeR6CaIE1mGfIGkJxYGmldcjTPTIQqHh4HW7dL/MR lyxDw9+GQxRQRMrZyVYMgA8WZ9wf5cqWLNgZwQX3Kea4Jes2SZab8jRPZ8bblLOhcdOK H3DQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FJ9q1eHPXsotvtk9RmNgCrR2O/0SMuldMHMNSMBcpWs=; b=B8fyvw323Ag2VvgFWAqlG7Zu3tmH0dUTHrab6v80qWXPf8CqjyAWMjtRzJZOxiq2jt S1oknL6XQPCI+pICgRMVrbGTwjmv1tfscdDsERYzIN2jJyqOEEyTPBIBY0rog/lzUOMF VDyH1JCSWZNV3ruxv9MnITHQTTJHepwcJ/aJvnQXjRbXCu+BbxAY5/aFmrJQ3qU3SqZj 6e3mEF7aPnMIBFbLiPVFB4RBvVvk3wmuS0bvGYx9fo9SlYgu+h5FLW/7GlVsOegSx6It LuUHMQvQjanf57PD9Ukqh6lQ4t5Cvtg67l42aG/CRgV6kfuNPlMJGKCFtxbrqYfcTlYV I8ig== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLfn+9cf7LewKBPZprEE0E4UhUbaBL9UIjZ0P66KxWGXDwu8z0NBFFl2c7H6dbxxUa1 X-Received: by 10.194.23.67 with SMTP id k3mr9649718wjf.177.1460126862852; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 07:47:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (91.111.75.86.rev.sfr.net. [86.75.111.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w186sm3382910wmd.20.2016.04.08.07.47.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 08 Apr 2016 07:47:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Xu, Qian Q" Cc: "Mcnamara, John" , dev@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 16:47:40 +0200 Message-ID: <2126301.mhDi6LQXts@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E03236545@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1460105823-2013-1-git-send-email-qian.q.xu@intel.com> <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E03236545@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc:add tested platforms and nics X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:47:43 -0000 2016-04-08 14:29, Xu, Qian Q: > Agreed, and others can add their NICs info into the tested NICs and platforms. One question about the release version, the NICs and platforms may change with the release version, for example, for each release, the information may be different, so we need mention the release version for the tested nics and platforms. Then how about putting them in one session of release notes? Please do at your convenience but do it quickly. Thanks > -----Original Message----- > From: Mcnamara, John > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 6:05 PM > To: Thomas Monjalon; Xu, Qian Q > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc:add tested platforms and nics > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 10:06 AM > > To: Xu, Qian Q > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Mcnamara, John > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc:add tested platforms and nics > > > > > overview > > > + test_platforms > > > > I think it would be better suited to integrate this information in the > > existing pages for e1000, ixgbe, i40e and fm10k. > > Hi, > > I think that this is better in one section where it can be reviewed together. I think it should be the last chapter in the section though. > > John. >