From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE8FA00BE; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:31:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0B71D171; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:31:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C6C1BE9C for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:31:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4C85C00F7; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:31:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:31:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= J/AeV9eQlr7kIR5fM0hMe8w1n76Oyg+zy/5xYDKFUmo=; b=FMH6MW4BK2onV5j3 AcG7pBPbN7c0b4IOAuDRDKNMdMco2q1Uo+rnx5H5OonCiw0UcHANcyFNEzYrdMc/ ApQK10fwCv7ez0drUbHEjKE+9DBUKxdUcsz9jnFTDwzY5YLZugCf82+KZoXaFQZf RHPe+tR8WM8f8W9t+Uld0r9ZU8Sl7RQg6PRISGVwIu8VlfWlmfry65sCMZ++wC5l YDrCjNS48S8k+nWgxlRwkBXOHbCf9TWK2o6CULIFAx+9hnTKUspK5oLmBFUQxlX9 YrPlQDWiOY8lWJmt0ti5zOA6JdprLrD98SsIb5x1XkZEVhlV9UABq0O1Z3RTkhR6 N0lNEQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=J/AeV9eQlr7kIR5fM0hMe8w1n76Oyg+zy/5xYDKFU mo=; b=GyqYXUazIbMPn5sLL/1ZGGFJIdHFy7BdRLrLMPnLemR6mpMqodKFbvo2a AZ01d+S8oALtwsn3fEnCjnR61q/4U+Y2ns3uJ7txXskWSa9KYNE/PQVMlEJ8DZRk ZJsg2TZWyeu/0504AycCT1npNzJHcJ7+wo6vr5+4OHbk7CpEN0yF0lNj7qIuBAWw d7Ysg1IjPYoDAIOBvst63OUMEzFnF8Zt5yeDMEOECC8R4qjesVtmQskMHxyqyVix +KyVYjcQFtwiYt+Jgun5up6b/IOO5v6Q87TB5AloBAnFLzylj2+RBd84M/DSzN7f 06cwZxJ0guUFXNJiN8bIhiqjhgw3w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrheelgdehudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1B6D83065E66; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:31:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: ray.kinsella@intel.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, Kevin Laatz , Ray Kinsella Cc: dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, harry.van.haaren@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, Haiyue Wang , ktraynor@redhat.com Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:31:01 +0200 Message-ID: <2126936.ZQ0cqP7t2B@thomas> In-Reply-To: <484d2d27-10d0-9e6a-c525-ee05b82e905c@ashroe.eu> References: <20200330121502.25555-1-kevin.laatz@intel.com> <1651663.4herOUoSWf@thomas> <484d2d27-10d0-9e6a-c525-ee05b82e905c@ashroe.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] eal/cpuflags: add x86 based cpu flags X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 27/04/2020 11:27, Ray Kinsella: > On 25/04/2020 17:04, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > PS: Who is REALLY maintaining the ABI? > > We really miss someone who carefully check all these things, > > and take care of the doc and tooling. > > I would say that I am missing these changes to libabigail.ignore, which would be useful. > Should we consolidate the ABI Policy and ABI Versioning sections of the MAINTAINERS file? Yes, I think it does not make sense spliting ABI topic in 2 sections in MAINTAINERS file. We need to have a clear ownership covering policy, libs, tooling and doc. Let's agree to merge all in one section please.