From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B79CA04B5; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 18:59:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6812BD3; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 18:59:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B170160 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 18:59:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E955C016C; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 12:59:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 06 Nov 2020 12:59:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= yVVpqQYtVV9zwttjePRdgQ7npgphvX/4EFlVcv7K8yg=; b=Ss+nKLxnvtd5ZFYQ LFIWyXaT89A8bOynDTJfn6d7go+cijrHdN7R+vl+fnyijqvSOiaoRbiOmObSD7Ub XjJA2Ao6Dmk0gtE6PGzb1x0dEtDH7rUV2MgRP4vCe7hmsjBOUsFW3kytihnt4yQx 7Eo+IqsOmnvJuQUlq/q48/kwEVDk47hR+q3cMLPbcnGhWH9GPkmgKp/yMzknlIEu 72u6vJl+cPenMSRXNBWm9/DwCCQg5XYeOTSTq32FlRH3yp2SUKXZ8+vOxdLbOL2m 5MZXx/HU/JKS06Lt4lzXF1RaZIB+37ZNnN5P9N2FD7d3JukJZGDILzZ3acaaUuwn mjg7TQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=yVVpqQYtVV9zwttjePRdgQ7npgphvX/4EFlVcv7K8 yg=; b=ReLPl0iLyrjuwgHRzzZF3N6tvyO88EHj+P3psLcF9qhwqTj5bKxaRZj// I8C3TpnNmn9+yguVB9vFEKVQ/FBU18UxnCrt2nYQD/MEkayILQZtb/cmcf6IiyjX Thvod91bLrSIaewb43POoS9ZrsjYhWewLr9U360eQudwfqITUuAH6Ajlj69KJY9/ FVJPoF46LrxrsdL22ijbPMVT8LfoLDhXkT3fzYzdDaHrLPJ40bro5BCRbVAZ478Y 2eHNrEfyhqTNTQv0a0l8Yf4Ais+bWsXuSYOkMUHKfKxwLuIxKdeN0HWy1X51as/m bjPieMA63/AttnKbBFjvnXQEZSqpA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedruddtledguddutdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeeh teffvdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefge drvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhl fhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A80CE32802F8; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 12:59:07 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Richardson, Bruce" , "Zhang, XuemingX" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Chen, Zhaoyan" , "Ma, LihongX" Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 18:59:06 +0100 Message-ID: <2129306.NRWLvje8d3@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20200422094854.7884-1-xuemingx.zhang@intel.com> <20200422111200.GC1402@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V1] add meson build 32-bits on x86_64 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 23/04/2020 10:23, Zhang, XuemingX: > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com] > >On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:48:54AM +0000, xueming wrote: > >> Add user interaction features. The default build is 64-bits. > >> if you want to build 32-bits on x86_64, need to pass parameters of i686. > >> Merge -vv and -v into the method > >> > >> Signed-off-by: xueming > >> --- > >I'm wondering if this would be better done using a cross-file, rather than > >overriding a bunch of environment variables - the pkg-config one would be > >especially relevant. A separate cross-file could be used for debian-based > >and fedora-based OS's with correct 32-bit paths and parameters in each. > > > >What do you think? > > > Many thanks Bruce, > Your suggestion is very good, I will try to do it Eventually the approach of this patch has been merged: http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=9b83106d