DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, liuyonglong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ethdev: clarify do not something in the new event
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 12:31:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2135427.KlZ2vcFHjT@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250115034110.15245-2-lihuisong@huawei.com>

15/01/2025 04:41, Huisong Li:
> If application verify the validity of the port id or configure this port in
> the new event callback, application may happen to the port id is invalid.
> 
> Actually, when application receive a new event from one port, the port is
> not fully probed and is just in allocated state. Application doesn't need
> to verify the validity of the port id because it is definitely valid.
> What's more, application shouldn't do something like configuring this port
> or querying some information of this port by ethdev ops.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> ---
>  lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> index 1f71cad244..e2021f0f12 100644
> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> @@ -4128,7 +4128,14 @@ enum rte_eth_event_type {
>  	RTE_ETH_EVENT_VF_MBOX,  /**< message from the VF received by PF */
>  	RTE_ETH_EVENT_MACSEC,   /**< MACsec offload related event */
>  	RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RMV, /**< device removal event */
> -	RTE_ETH_EVENT_NEW,      /**< port is probed */
> +	/** Port is probed and application's event callback will be called.

We are not going to say that the callback is called for each event :)

> +	 * In this moment, the port is not fully probed and is just in allocated
> +	 * state. When application receive this event, application doesn't need

It is not a real state.

> +	 * to verify the validity of the port id because it is definitely valid.
> +	 * What's more, application shouldn't do something like configuring this
> +	 * port or querying some information of this port by ethdev ops.
> +	 */

Let me try shorter:
"
The port is being probed, i.e. allocated and not yet available.
It is too early to check validity, infos, or configuring the port.
"

What do you think? Anything missing?



  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-15 11:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-15  3:41 [PATCH v1 0/2] ethdev: clarify something about " Huisong Li
2025-01-15  3:41 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] ethdev: clarify do not something in the " Huisong Li
2025-01-15 11:31   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2025-01-15  3:41 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] ethdev: fix some APIs can be used " Huisong Li
2025-01-15 11:36   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2135427.KlZ2vcFHjT@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).