From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Jerin Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"ciara.power@intel.com" <ciara.power@intel.com>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"keith.wiles@intel.com" <keith.wiles@intel.com>,
dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] No telemetry legacy support print
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 10:14:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2135610.AARW3okAIO@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8x8yV1UGCeBiXQZYQZN22KXf2fHkUUcRBtf9+xx=d59Mw@mail.gmail.com>
22/05/2020 09:47, David Marchand:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 9:15 AM Jerin Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com> wrote:
> >
> > "No telemetry legacy support " prints pops up on all the default dpdk applications now.
> > Is it worth to print? Since it using direct 'printf', we cannot even disable through dynamic logging.
> > Is possible to remove that print at least, if non legacy telemetry init is successful.
> > Thoughts?
>
> This init function is odd as it calls printf in error and warning
> cases and sets an error string when it succeeds.
> Let's remove the two printf in this init function.
>
> If we really care about the warning message, we have to initialise
> *err_str to NULL (+ this must be described in the function prototype).
> In EAL init, we can then add a rte_eal_init_alert with the error
> string when telemetry init fails and maybe a warning message if
> err_str != NULL.
There are 5 printf in telemetry.
The definitive fix should be to split EAL:
- 1 low-level layer offering arch and OS support, including early logs.
- 1 high-level layer including configuration parsing and rte_eal_init().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-22 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-22 7:14 Jerin Kollanukkaran
2020-05-22 7:47 ` David Marchand
2020-05-22 8:14 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-05-22 9:55 ` Power, Ciara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2135610.AARW3okAIO@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).