From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64AC3376E for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 01:54:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id n186so9376847wmn.1 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:54:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NoUsKgoA4iC7KkLY3KvT2ce6q91JLKY8MAra6+qUQd0=; b=2Qbib8hc4DiXDNqzSdNL2ONFis1JqUzomU0UkSVpLbQsA2FYIVggBjdMsJmA0b2V6H bwIFXi5YUPlxNW4dliB6KtkrV3TTx79hAEgw5hEYKsvpFO2AALHs9/d11bHKixLZw9bC oZJW60AqVjTg8HrNehevEB8lEdLbroT4c/ATbehSFUw97LrkA1lwclTcLl3yZuA+MhUz y3nKcL/QJ5NLnWLuPu8bIxpLsMA6/Q76K34RfydTeHEh/WENyCEiN5gDBjpRzi1PvJBp qujlHHIg48xN7ik3pEEeFvdOZ0TE+XTiKogzaxR+Ps2nV6wwqWGHzn8sOCt43bs7cbpn tKGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NoUsKgoA4iC7KkLY3KvT2ce6q91JLKY8MAra6+qUQd0=; b=N6hW7meRkY8szICZ+tBsrO1f6RNxnIIpWo3yGeFA2mgGMJXh9p6G97Se9R1oWlqxPB z+QT9NPGD76AYM89aENUtAzcT5tYbWeoec614P7Usw7INf/rC0WAQjc2FKsrjUznEj4x lDDJmpup3cO/i36oR7Axs9DSagCRXuT2O9O9e4tdEgIoALflnmVVE8hUfENhk7ASEkMR AAgXY3ynBBBx1LM5sVQvOcr1wo7fIGaW5sMF7UTBesuqUhSZdu8QmX9NA3GpvBB5ITL8 4Vi+VkGh51o6BMfapM4iS1gCrgOcWJjbnZN7Wn15Y9JOkUXh9xr4U0X4zqoiyv1WraY5 0sXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJn6j08PfQEXWnGMxLPMn8/sSVZ6nxUS4WNtKP90+zc50LSRCb0N8yDjJO+Qe9Wt+GP X-Received: by 10.28.11.69 with SMTP id 66mr153005wml.103.1457657666275; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:54:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (91.111.75.86.rev.sfr.net. [86.75.111.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gb9sm5946922wjb.26.2016.03.10.16.54.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:54:25 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Yaron Illouz Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 01:52:43 +0100 Message-ID: <2146921.CJZ2iDn7OE@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09090343A1BC@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09090343A1BC@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] ixgbevf missed stats X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:54:26 -0000 2016-03-11 00:47, Lu, Wenzhuo: > From: Yaron Illouz [mailto:yaroni@radcom.com] > > Is this the same for dpdk with virtio? Can I know if there where dropps? > I think this's another story. Let's wait and see what the virtio experts will teach us :) I'm not a virtio expert, but I think it's difficult to communicate an imissed information when the interface between host and guest is overloaded. CC Michael Tsirkin who has probably already thought how to solve it. Would it be possible to have some notifications when packets are dropped in vhost due to jam?