From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Gaëtan Rivet" <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/failsafe: do not probe device if plugged out
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:17:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2174554.9RIM1Tt4jP@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170713081439.GH11154@bidouze.vm.6wind.com>
13/07/2017 10:14, Gaëtan Rivet:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 08:52:33AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 12/07/2017 22:39, Gaëtan Rivet:
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > >
> > > Nice idea. A few remarks below:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 08:28:12PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > FOREACH_SUBDEV(sdev, i, dev) {
> > > > if (sdev->state != DEV_PARSED)
> > > > continue;
> > > > da = &sdev->devargs;
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Superfluous line.
> >
> > I don't think so :) It is isolating the "skip" block with its comment.
> >
> > > > + /* skip plugged out devices */
> > > > + if (! first_init
> > > > + && sdev->cmdline == NULL
> > > > + && strcmp(da->bus->name, "vdev") != 0) {
> > >
> > > Use first_init == false instead of negation.
> > > && should be at the end of the line instead of the start of the next
> > > one.
> >
> > Yes
> >
> > > Indentation is wrong.
> >
> > No, the coding style is to put 2 tabs for continuation lines.
> >
> > > > + da->bus->scan();
> > > > + if (bus->find_device(NULL, cmp_dev_name, da->name) == NULL)
> > > > + continue; /* device not found */
> > >
> > > da->bus->find_device instead of bus->find_device.
> > > This function cannot find the device back currently on the PCI bus,
> > > blocking the plugging of VF.
> > >
> > > The PCI bus will scan the VF while no rte_devargs exists to
> > > describe it within the global list. If the device exists, it will
> > > detect it, allocate it and then set its name.
> > > Without any rte_devargs, the name of a PCI device falls back to its
> > > canonical name (DomBDF instead of BDF). The name comparison with
> > > da->name can only succeed if the slave was declared using the DomBDF
> > > format.
> > >
> > > The fix is to do a deep copy of the rte_devargs (the API has been
> > > sent previously with the rte_devargs rework but I have since removed
> > > it) and insert it using rte_eal_devargs_insert(). This is essentially
> > > the solution I used for the rte_eal_hotplug_add() fix[1].
> > >
> > > The alternative fix is to propose an API for buses to transform device
> > > names into their canonical form on demand... And it would certainly only
> > > be useful for the PCI bus.
> > >
> > > The issue is discussed there:
> > > [1]: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-July/071155.html
> >
> > OK, I was not aware of this exact issue.
> > So I will wait above fix.
>
> The fix above will not solve this issue.
> If you are waiting for a proper, general fix, I don't think it will
> arrive anytime soon.
>
> I have the rte_eal_devargs_clone and a working version that I can send
> in-reply-to if you want. But that's an API extension while in RC2 so...
No worries, it can be fixed in 17.11.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-13 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-12 18:28 Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-12 20:39 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-07-13 6:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-13 8:14 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-07-13 9:17 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2017-07-18 8:39 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-07-18 20:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2174554.9RIM1Tt4jP@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).