From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Michal Kobylinski <michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] examples: update to use new lpm lib for ipv4
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 01:45:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2184990.3GvJWPVT2Q@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457470323-26368-3-git-send-email-michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>
2016-03-08 21:52, Michal Kobylinski:
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kobylinski <michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>
> Acked-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
> ---
> examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c | 16 ++++++------
> examples/ip_reassembly/main.c | 15 +++++------
> examples/l3fwd-power/main.c | 2 +-
> examples/l3fwd-vf/main.c | 2 +-
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_sse.h | 2 +-
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.h | 6 ++---
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_sse.h | 24 ++++++++++--------
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_sse.h | 8 +++---
> examples/load_balancer/runtime.c | 2 +-
> examples/performance-thread/l3fwd-thread/main.c | 33 ++++++++++++++-----------
I get this error:
examples/performance-thread/l3fwd-thread/main.c:1354:26: error:
use of undeclared identifier 'next_hop'
About the patch format:
- v3 is missing in the title
- it should follow the v2 thread with --in-reply-to
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-09 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 20:52 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Increased number of next hops for LPM IPv4 Michal Kobylinski
2016-03-08 20:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] lpm: extended ipv4 next_hop field Michal Kobylinski
2016-03-08 20:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] examples: update to use new lpm lib for ipv4 Michal Kobylinski
2016-03-09 0:45 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-03-09 0:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Increased number of next hops for LPM IPv4 Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-09 9:28 ` Kobylinski, MichalX
2016-03-09 12:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] lpm: extended ipv4 next_hop field Michal Jastrzebski
2016-03-09 13:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-09 16:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] Increased number of next hops for LPM IPv4 Michal Jastrzebski
2016-03-09 16:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] lpm: extended ipv4 next_hop field Michal Jastrzebski
2016-03-09 16:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] lpm: added a new rte_lpm_config structure for ipv4 Michal Jastrzebski
2016-03-09 22:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] Increased number of next hops for LPM IPv4 Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2184990.3GvJWPVT2Q@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=michalx.kobylinski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).