From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42092A0549; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:39:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2F816070A; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:39:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E9A4014E for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:38:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6212ABEF; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:38:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 09 Feb 2021 11:38:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= KW6rJqrfq+HXfvq5EqZzCrxVV2cA5hJxPlESERakJv0=; b=PRvRP6X7Og8aIrYo /u41sxJ4sQI17uFv+8GRpeZ+OoAL0zJFHHupwzD6jGUjoSqyFVNCXehJtAKD/ATS vyVKq1WYVg2eB0M9Nf1DSTatKvx8j3bGgfVO6IzP1Qj4jaJtttx3eiBdSCIW0uCV VeDPy5TYT/vOSwMT1LXSLzh/g8c+V5O26h8Wrb2pi2xu/Tc6MRHvsnx+AxY5QMXB r40H65mrluE+gufB/x9Sn54rlRH/fgRhJn8t7WUrO/ERCDb5uV7ZcAwcrV3t/x05 1K6JCSQ74mxoy6/t9vo6MDiAffU4svoGbNEJG+1UmBLuLWxqNiBQDLNeZYzBF3XB Jq9M0A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=KW6rJqrfq+HXfvq5EqZzCrxVV2cA5hJxPlESERakJ v0=; b=UoHH7pQpTlfPPDidBpSp0oOsxCLN+zTwd6/N7PUSvoJw8fp39O3akaFqG UaCgpzRst/RtDhtM9bXPptpF9X+/bn2oYfCnzphzpZY3xkj3Hjmyp6AVL9c8R2gM FQ0i2G8NvhZQ9TzCWHAgy8qIWXIXGj8pZ571767dXIaDHNhtrrCvjHACcbXhpMIh hMoKu++7iw4djxrKrC8eo3rM9eerX9jR4slNAvI2fQjxJlFJMaYTX2KeokXGyk3C AUE6GtCK+1fhBeePMY9BqZEYzGZPupD5LhkZ/aT3CmRWAFfSm5k5ZP+ITnHgbBXe WzQtMKhRmRqjHh0vypjMgEicOT4IA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrheehgdelvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeehteff vdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvd dtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhr ohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DE706240057; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:38:55 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, David Marchand , Aaron Conole Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:38:53 +0100 Message-ID: <2189598.20HeUBaClg@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20210209152643.1832506-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> References: <20210209152643.1832506-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] devtools: add llx format specifier check X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 09/02/2021 16:26, Ferruh Yigit: > %llx tends to be wrong when used for fixed size, like uint64_t, > variables, adding a warning to double check them. > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit > --- > + # check %llx usage > + awk -v FOLDERS='lib drivers app examples' \ > + -v EXPRESSIONS='%ll*[xud]' \ > + -v RET_ON_FAIL=1 \ > + -v MESSAGE='Please check %llx usage which tends to be wrong most of the times' \ +1 It reminds me this old email: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2018-February/091483.html The title mentions llx, but it should be %ll in general: devtools: check %ll format specifier