DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Andrius Sirvys <andrius.sirvys@intel.com>,
	Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, john.mcnamara@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] usertools: dpdk-telemetry-client.py run into looping status
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 09:17:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2194097.CDRCBNjSrz@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190807130458.16754-1-andrius.sirvys@intel.com>

07/08/2019 15:04, Andrius Sirvys:
> The ast.literal_eval() was used incorrectly and wouldn't properly
> retrieve the user option. Was causing the options to keep being listed
> in a loop. Removed and replaced with raw_input() being cast to an int.
> Works as expected now.

You mean you added "ast.literal_eval()" without testing it?

Kevin, that's not the first time I ask,
who is testing this telemetry stuff?
I have the bad feeling this is a toy,
and you send random untested patches for it.
How I can know this patch is seriously tested enough
before merging it at the last minute in 19.08?

> Fixes: 53f293c9a783 ("usertools: replace unsafe input function")
> Cc: andrius.sirvys@intel.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrius Sirvys <andrius.sirvys@intel.com>
> ---
> v2: Removed unnecessary comments

Please keep all versions in the same email thread by using --in-reply-to

>  try:
> -	raw_input  # Python 2
> +        raw_input  # Python 2
>  except NameError:
> -	raw_input = input  # Python 3
> +        raw_input = input  # Python 3

Why changing this indentation?



  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-08  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-07 13:04 Andrius Sirvys
2019-08-08  7:17 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-08-08 14:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] usertools: fix input handling in telemetry script Andrius Sirvys
2019-08-08 15:32   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2019-08-08 15:32   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2194097.CDRCBNjSrz@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=andrius.sirvys@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.laatz@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).