From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com
[66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F521B32F
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 00:30:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5490209B1;
Mon, 6 Nov 2017 18:30:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161])
by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 06 Nov 2017 18:30:52 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=KDS+YboGZHNiL2NN8EkxCXLll4
CIibpom4GXun3zIko=; b=gi/eV1WQgXml+/wygkEWsfjfiv+PUYuwEJqyc66TTj
7ea6HEislV9h0tf8wYnUtkQdaHvM9QmySmfy8jmeAdM4kulc/JpeknzOpelGAMkc
Btb8c8K694MhKOhEQPYLRc22RI57vVkuMxg/JSYC5KJwLmqs6rCJnT3qG9cv0ZAz
o=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=KDS+Yb
oGZHNiL2NN8EkxCXLll4CIibpom4GXun3zIko=; b=Jf5SD/ztZFJrG0RUYgifVH
SYmzqhoTh09gFgHLlV7hVPXVuILo1+yYbp//nqu01BjFSTXUeY861uI+woak+1cj
1P9h+KPU5dT4lxK8ux2pwxAuBI6ZvqK4fnsf9Ux66MYIrGklEhDv2Fd3xyz7d95X
YID9nW0s5fF4vUN94lA6HkgvB8WVKQid7v1DbgQgXc2flbLrS6l8m30ZDgCYzy8z
v+7JQaGARXW4QaxEQ3YGtCYaX7FauVqmTDo84iPsaguLk1wEqT8qPsczY8A99caa
D438DzXj4iDwrZGLoYDzG+xYCjXHOgXQXxAYNQABlUdNijNF8rybuWrRpOgCKfDg
==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:rPAAWi-Ho3FC7ZmgyvF3p8X1AG-Zd9CzP0moXwCMY0E0KMLWZNNenQ>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7342D240B2;
Mon, 6 Nov 2017 18:30:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Jonas Pfefferle <jpf@zurich.ibm.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, anatoly.burakov@intel.com, chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:30:51 +0100
Message-ID: <2195471.a96TPSDOjF@xps>
In-Reply-To: <1509631099-31832-1-git-send-email-jpf@zurich.ibm.com>
References: <1509631099-31832-1-git-send-email-jpf@zurich.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/ppc: revert fix mmap for memory
initialization
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 23:30:53 -0000
02/11/2017 14:58, Jonas Pfefferle:
> This reverts commit 284ae3e9ff9a92575c28c858efd2c85c8de6d440
> ("eal/ppc: fix mmap for memory initialization").The logic if the
> address hint is respected on mmap is no different on POWER than
> on x86 however the address layout of userspace applications might
> be slightly different i.e. you might need to use a different
> virt-baseaddr. We now warn if the address hint is not respected
> (fae209f) thus users can try different virtual address bases.
It depends on a patch which is not applied yet.