From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f180.google.com (mail-wj0-f180.google.com [209.85.210.180]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87B7106A for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 23:14:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f180.google.com with SMTP id xy5so339561662wjc.0 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 14:14:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SaoEqAmCI5RKQT/cG0Z0Jm+lDpu4oReq2YR1L48CgkI=; b=UZbzlRzj6PEAg8wIpPKEcf1GBi+raIK0dHMEgKYEYNs6nVO0T+Ai4Ku+vqgIv1VyxK c7t5FeCCJDtDNK7GxWjwxupP/XloNVQ4R8IRTh0EYErQcqGaWhOtyRy5r+TFOgB0LAjQ wgPMgNYcTZDh2EWxsRqz5cMzBdRR2bZRif2mIfX03wKRSIWwCQSL+1x2nUZQHi5ZqVrT 9L1jC2uXHAdfMQOn4gk7CfMUOXXV+Z+gotac/y25vjSNwbmjIEdKOmSI5d3vvCoBoesi NPAIiWsF1xNdXqK5eSp1HjBxdyYtv6o7GFnLc8+hMloQ0Q93dy9mM7QRK4+OpBoyQE9Z IQNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SaoEqAmCI5RKQT/cG0Z0Jm+lDpu4oReq2YR1L48CgkI=; b=OXFiOTmV456cHD3TVfARGjK3OoFNj5d+gjRoV5NFPKAQo1tBILDZt3f5Zm0V1av6vo 0ksZaDlH6zyYAED6qtil/GyZkO6lJZubVrwvXlqLWBPE+JPfCda5FKaWSnq8JhWmCiJV SIO9ZjfGhNJbbCCzrahbdYDOivICRQa9xxyfUB/U5asNDBUCCe0K2V1/AmSWGrj963RD 1XbsgJh+IZOW3RkGol3CoYYjl5UKL2r0mb6tG/jnPCFuHo+ciHvqGv0gMh2YBAVLDNaA CdiagfJuI9Xz1xValM1YJvHDN3cbsTQfvhlLND2DjFnfaEvWVkhw4LcOiWKYdBgCkZbZ Hn0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01NFgzr/RVcGZCa0vdzzWM27Z6SEk7qT6IrSsMbZjiB2OViBzjWhDC//sEapAaYfaNn X-Received: by 10.194.89.132 with SMTP id bo4mr32296163wjb.177.1481062455588; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 14:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k2sm27940487wjv.11.2016.12.06.14.14.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Dec 2016 14:14:14 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Cristian Dumitrescu Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 23:14:13 +0100 Message-ID: <2204708.uGZ3ieR731@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20161206115124.67ccc0c7@xeon-e3> References: <1480529810-95280-1-git-send-email-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> <20161206115124.67ccc0c7@xeon-e3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: abstraction layer for QoS hierarchical scheduler X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:14:16 -0000 2016-12-06 11:51, Stephen Hemminger: > Rather than reinventing wheel which seems to be DPDK Standard > Procedure, could an existing abstraction be used? Stephen, you know that the DPDK standard procedure is to consider reviews and good comments ;)